Belt and Road Initiative – Hong Kong the Gateway for RMB Internationalization

The Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) is a transcontinental long-term policy and investment program which aims at infrastructure development and acceleration of the economic integration of countries along the route of the historic Silk Road. 

BRI was unveiled in 2013 by China’s President Xi Jinping and, according to the Belt and Road Portal, the massive project will encompass 60 countries, that together represent more than a third of the world`s GDP and two-thirds of the world`s population. 

According to the official outline, BRI aims to “promote the connectivity of Asian, European and African continents and their adjacent seas, establish and strengthen partnerships among the countries along the Belt and Road, set up all-dimensional, multi-tiered and composite connectivity networks, and realize diversified, independent, balanced and sustainable development in these countries.”

Many analysts have come to view BRI as a diplomatic offensive with geopolitical motives. However, the initiative is primarily driven by China’s pressing need to transform its national economy through further integration with the outside world.  

“FinTech, especially blockchain will make a significant impact on the global monetary system. With the recent uncertainties of China-US trade war and the emerging role of FinTech in transforming the global monetary system, the HKSAR government and the Hong Kong Trade Development Council (HKTDC) hosted the 4th Belt and Road Summit in Hong Kong.”Kun Hu, CEO of Blockchain.News

In recent years, much has been said and written about China’s flagship Initiative, and the uncertainties that surround it—What are the implications of BRI projects for local and regional economies, societies and the environment? What are the specific financial risks of BRI projects? How much will the BRI reshape the global trade system and potentially the geopolitical order? In this article, we hope to shed more light on the ever-expanding influence of China’s initiative and the role Hong Kong will play as its major offshore settlement hub.

China’s Expanding Influence

China’s stellar rise to become the world’s 2nd greatest economic power, especially after joining WTO in 2001, demonstrates how it has benefited from globalization and free trade. BRI appears to be China’s continued globalization effort interwoven with its quest for structural reform of the economy.

The BRI combines land-based ‘belt’ projects, such as roads, bridge, rail links and pipelines, in six economic corridors with sea-based ‘road’ projects such as ports. It spreads over China’s nearest neighbors as well as countries in South Asia, the Middle East, Africa and Europe.

Significant boost on China’s economic and political influenceThe BRI supports a diverse array of initiatives that enhance connectivity throughout Eurasia—effectively bolstering development throughout the region and beyond. The initiative also serves to significantly strengthen China’s economic and political interests.

The BRI will expand China’s economic and political influence throughout the region. China has explicitly acknowledged its potential gains in their official outline— such as the expansion of its export markets, the internationalization of the Renminbi (RMB), and the reduction of trade frictions like tariffs and transport costs.

Developing and connecting hard infrastructure with neighboring countries will help reduce transport times and costs. Establishing soft infrastructure with partner countries will allow for a broader range of goods to be traded with fewer regulatory hurdles and a relaxation of protectionisms. Raising capital for these infrastructure projects by issuing bonds in RMB will encourage its use in international financial centers. China will also boost growth in its lower-income western provinces by building overland economic connectivity with Central Asia.According to Chinapower, many of the potential benefits of BRI are less publicly articulated. For instance, some of China’s State Owned Enterprises (SOE) – such as steel, cement and construction companies – have found themselves at overcapacity after racing to expand factories and hire workers to support the once booming domestic economy. SOEs are now struggling to find productive uses for their surplus of resources and has left China with a large reserve of savings that up until now has not been invested properly. Investing the surplus in large-scale infrastructure throughout the Belt and Road projects enables China to export its excess savings and create work for its SOEs.As Chinese manufacturing shifts to low-cost economies it will have a positive effect on their investment inflows and help these nations integrate into the global value chain. Pakistan, Bangladesh, Malaysia and the Philippines are especially likely to make gains with increases in investment, trade, tourism and overall accelerated development. The large-scale physical infrastructure investment should deliver faster overall economic growth and could potentially fast-track BRI countries towards digitization. 

Debt Concerns Raised

Since late 2013, Beijing has been pouring Chinese money into Belt & Road countries, much of it in the form of large-scale infrastructure projects and loans to governments that would otherwise struggle to pay for these types of projects.

China’s central bank chief, Yi Gang, revealed that Chinese banks have so far loaned some $440 billion for Belt and Road projects. The total value of all BRI projects worldwide currently stands at $3.67 trillion, according to data from Refinitiv, a financial markets data provider.

Transportation projects are the main player of BRI projects (44%), followed by power and water (23%) and real estate (18%) (see Exhibit 1). Governments support the majority of funding on BRI projects (63%) (see Exhibit 2), whereas Russia and Egypt are the top trading nations on the BRI (see Exhibit 3).

Exhibit 1: BRI Projects by Industry

Source: Refinitiv BRI database

 

Exhibit 2: BRI Projects by Funding Sector

Source: Refinitiv BRI database

 

Exhibit 3: BRI – Top Trading Nations

Source: Refinitiv BRI database

The United States and some of its allies have warned that BRI increases China’s global influence over low-income countries by offering them construction project loans they cannot repay. Sri Lanka is the example most pointed to, when the poor island nation was forced to hand over Hambantota port to China on a 99-year lease in 2017 after the nation failed to repay its debts to the Middle Kingdom.

In a report entitled, “The Debt Implications of the Belt and Road Initiative”—John Hurley, Center for Global Development in Washington commented on the almost free-flow of capital from Beijing to these poorer nations, warning that:

“The Belt and Road provides something that most countries desperately want—financing for infrastructure. But when it comes to this kind of lending, there can be too much of a good thing.”

Although China has vowed to “prevent and resolve debt risks” by ensuring long-term financing sustainability in future BRI projects, concerns persist that the new digital Silk Road could lead to indirect authoritarian rule, particularly in terms of internet and information censorship.

Hong Kong—China’s Offshore Settlement Hub

Mainland China’s Thirteenth Five-Year Plan for National Economic and Social Development reiterates its determination to make the renminbi convertible for capital account to push ahead with capital account liberalization and renminbi (RMB) internationalization. The plan further supports Hong Kong to strengthen its status as a global offshore renminbi business hub.

For China, the world’s largest trading nation, the BRI also serves as a platform for the promotion of the Chinese yuan or renminbi (RMB) and to achieve further global integration of its currency. The majority of the work in modernizing trading routes with infrastructure development along the Belt and Road will be settled in RMB and the vast amount of loans issued by China to B&R countries are also in RMB.

Hong Kong has often acted as the Mainland’s gateway to the global market. In 2007, the first offshore bond was issued in Hong Kong. In what has since been coined the dim-sum bond market, the RMB market in Hong Kong has grown to the largest outside of Mainland China with outstanding bonds amounting to RMB367 billion at the end of October 2015.

According to the HKMA, Hong Kong’s experience and solid foundation gives it a clear and unique advantage in its very close economic and business links with Mainland China. Around a quarter of Mainland China’s trade volume is intermediated by Hong Kong in the form of offshore trade or re-exports. Hong Kong is the largest source of foreign direct investment for Mainland China, accounting for about 65% of the total amount as of December 2014. In addition, Hong Kong is the largest recipient of direct investment from Mainland China, being either the beneficiary or intermediary of almost 60% of such investment. These trends highlight Hong Kong’s unique role as both the bridge for foreign companies to access the market in Mainland China and the launching pad for institutions in Mainland China to gain exposure to international markets.

Info updated as of 7 Nov 2019 

Can MakerDAO Survive the Coronavirus Pandemic?

The coronavirus pandemic and growing macroeconomic uncertainties have seriously dampened the cryptocurrency market, which Bitcoin once dipped below $4000. The “Red Sea” has expanded across the market of decentralized finance (DeFi), where the total value locked (USD) for the DeFi market dropped from $649M to $246M.

Widespread Concerns over MakerDAO community

The share plunge of the cryptocurrency market has severely hit MakerDAO, the leader in the DeFi ecosystem. Maker (MKR) resulted in a massive drop to $246M, compared to $889M a day ago. Such a sharp plunge of Maker’s market value led to widespread concern on the future of Maker. The community-initiated the thread in the MakerDAO forum, in particular, addressing the issue of whether MakerDAO will consider an Emergency Shutdown in the short term.

Per the “Black Thursday Response Thread” initiated by developer “LongForWisdom” on March 13, the community discussed the current actions are taken, the arrangement of regularly scheduled polls and a possible emergency shutdown in the short term. Apart from the forum discussion, Maker has published a blog post regarding the next steps to be taken amid a recent market crash.

Emergency Shutdown is not an Immediate Option

The official blogpost of Maker revealed that there is no planned emergency shutdown, with Ethereum developer Ryan Berckmans concluded a summary of Maker community call stating,

“An emergency shutdown (not happening now) would cause DAI holders to take a haircut, whereas the social contract of MakerDAO is that MKR tokens take a haircut in the event of system failure. Therefore, we should try and ensure that MKR holders take a hair cut by avoiding emergency shutdown if possible. I heard that an emergency shutdown is not being considered as an immediate option.”

Key Changes to be Made

While Maker has no intention to an immediate shutdown, the Foundation agrees that the following issues need to be addressed:

1) DAI is off-peg

The cryptocurrency market has seen a wide “Red Sea”, except for stablecoins such as multi-collateral DAI (MCD). Following the global stock market crash, the price of multi-collateral DAI (MCD) lost the dollar peg and reached USD 1.07. To restore the pegging between MCD and USD, the MakerDAO community is proposing the reduction of DAI Saving Rate (DSR) which brings more DAI in circulation and thus moving the DAI price closer to the $1 peg. Another proposal is the reduction of global stability fee, an attempt to narrow the MCD/USD spread by opening more vaults (formerly known as collateralized debt positions) for arbitrage on the price of DAI.

2) How does MakerDAO settle 4.5M Debt?

With the 30% price drop in Ethereum, some vaults that use Ethereum to mint DAI can dip below the collateralization requirement of 150% and thus undercollateralized. The sharp plunge in the Ethereum price made a lot of vaults available for liquidation. When multiple users liquidated their contracts, this led to the congestion of the Ethereum network and the gas price surged significantly.

During the liquidation process, collateral is auctioned for DAI to repay any outstanding debts. When there is not enough liquidity for keepers to absorb all the liquidations, and one keeper bid $0 ETH with no competition. The lack of competition means bidders can win liquidation auctions without exchange of DAI. As a result, some vaults are liquidated without any DAI circulate back into the system, leading to a 4.5m outstanding under-collateralized debt owed in the MakerDAO system.

To settle the outstanding debts, Maker decided to conduct the first-ever debt auction. According to the official whitepaper, the protocol debt is covered by DAI in the Maker Buffer. The Maker protocol will trigger a debt auction if DAI in Maker Buffer is insufficient to cover the debt. In the debt auction, the system mints MKR token to increase the amount of MKR in circulation, and the minted MKR token will be sold to bidders of DAI.

Results of Executive Voting

The Maker Foundation Interim Governance Facilitator conducted the executive voting on “Adjust Multiple Risk Parameters”. Apart from the risk parameters to restore the peg and debt repayment, the proposal also included the reduction of the debt ceiling and adjustments in Flip and Flop auction. The proposal is passed on March 13 07:14 (UTC). The proposed adjustment of multiple risk parameters will be available for execution on March 14.

Image via Shutterstock

The Issuance of a $1.5B Junk Bond by Coinbase Indicates Investors are Eager to Join Crypto

Coinbase’s sale of a junk bond with a total value of $1.5 billion shows that cryptocurrencies have gradually become mainstream.

The total amount of $1.5 billion in bonds is expected to sell. However, Moody’s Investor Services, a world-renowned credit ratings institution set Coinbase Global Inc.’s debt issuer rating to non-investment grade or junk grade mainly due to the uncertain regulatory environment and future competition. 

Several analysts from Moody’s Fadi Abdel Massih, Donald Robertson, and Ana Arsov wrote in a report on Tuesday:

“Coinbase’s financial profile suggests investment-grade credit strength, but for now the uncertain regulatory environment and fierce competition offset these strengths.”

Coinbase sells two types of bonds, 7-year bonds due in 2028 at a coupon rate of 3.375% and 10-year bonds due in 2031 at an interest rate of 3.625%.

An industry research analyst from Bloomberg said Julie Chariell said that:

“The strong demand is clearly a big endorsement by debt investors.”

This bond issuance is a favourable event for the entire cryptocurrency industry and Coinbase. This product allows investors to directly participate in the benefits of cryptocurrency without investing in cryptocurrency and earn interest from it.

Since the bonds are one grade lower than the investment grade, Coinbase did not get the lowest borrowing cost. Generally speaking, the average yield of similarly-rated bonds is about 2.86%, which is lower than the interest rate of more than 3% this time.

Coinbase is not the first U.S. marketer to issue cryptocurrency-related bonds. As early as June of this year, MicroStrategy Inc. announced that the company plans to offer $400 million of senior secured notes to qualified institutional buyers to raise more capital to make more Bitcoin purchases.

As reported by Blockchain.News yesterday, Nasdaq-listed cryptocurrency exchange Coinbase Global Inc has announced its plans to raise new capital by issuing $1.5 billion aggregate principal amount of its Senior Notes to potential investors.

CoinFLEX to Sue Robert Ver to Recover $84m Outstanding Debt

CoinFLEX, a Hong Kong-based physical futures crypto exchange, announced last Saturday that it has taken legal action to recover $84 million from a single long-term serving client.

Last month, the exchange suspended withdrawals after a counterparty later revealed as longtime crypto investor Roger Ver failed to repay $47 million from a margin call.

Last Saturday, the exchange further revealed that the total amount owed by the investor is $84 million. The exchange said so after it calculated a final amount of losses from significant positions in its native FLEX token.

CoinFLEX co-founders Sudhu Arumugam and Mark disclosed that the exchange has begun an arbitration proceeding in Hong Kong to recover the $84 million. Founders said that process could take about 12 months before a judgment is delivered.

CoinFLEX co-founders commented: “We have commenced arbitration in HKIAC (Hong Kong International Arbitration Centre) for the recovery of this $84 million as the individual had a legal obligation under the agreement to pay and has refused to do so. His liability to pay is a personal liability which means the individual is personally liable to pay the total amount, so our lawyers are very confident that we can enforce the award against him.”

The founders further disclosed that CoinFLEX has signed a joint venture with a certain US-based crypto exchange as part of efforts to revive its fortunes.

Meanwhile, CoinFlex is planning to allow temporary withdrawals from its platform, though with some limitations. On Saturday, the founders revealed a “Locked Funds Plan” for the withdrawals. They mentioned that CoinFlex has been engaging in discussions with creditors, investors, and others, and now the exchange is looking into creating some temporary liquidity for its depositors.

Ripple Effects of Current Market Crash

On 23rd June, CoinFLEX halted withdrawals citing “extreme market conditions” alongside uncertainty regarding a certain counterparty. During that time, CoinFlex CEO Mark Lamb clarified that the counterparty is not any lending firm nor Three Arrows Capital.

On 28th June, the exchange announced plans to raise $47 million via a token sale to resolve the withdrawal problem. The withdrawal issues came after a certain individual’s account associated with Roger Ver, went into negative equity during the recent market turbulence.  

CoinFLEX described the client as a “high integrity” individual, with liquidity issues linked to the recent plunge in crypto and non-crypto markets, who has “significant shareholdings in several unicorn private companies and a large portfolio.”

Celsius is "Deeply Insolvent", Says Vermont's Financial Regulator

Celsius Network is “deeply insolvent”, Vermont’s Department of Financial Regulation (DFR) said on Tuesday, adding that the cryptocurrency lender is also not honouring its obligations to customers and creditors as it does not have the assets and liquidity to do so.

The DFR also said that Celsius has been involved in an unregistered securities offering, selling cryptocurrency interest accounts to retail investors including investors in Vermont and the crypto lender also lacks a money transmitter license.

Celsius, until recently was operating largely without regulatory oversight.

The regulator said, “due to its failure to register its interest accounts as securities, Celsius customers did not receive critical disclosures about its financial condition, investing activities, risk factors, and ability to repay its obligations to depositors and other creditors.”

Furthermore, the multistate investigation of Celsius has been joined by the state agency. While, the company’s decision to suspend customer redemptions is being investigated by state securities regulators in Alabama, Kentucky, New Jersey, Texas and Washington.

Celsius had positioned itself in the market by promising more than 18% in interest to peoples’ holdings who gave it their digital coins. The crypto lender, in turn, lent those coins out, Bloomberg reported.

However, the crypto lender has already begun repaying debts as it continues tackling the potential insolvency issue.

Celsius Network on Monday repaid partial debts to decentralized finance and lending platforms Aave and Compound respectively, Blockchain.News reported citing sources.

According to tracker Etherscan, the crypto lender repaid $78.1 million worth of USDC stablecoin to Aave and $35 million worth of stablecoin DAI on the platform Compound.

The Block reported that Celsius also withdrew 6,083 wrapped bitcoin (worth approximately $124 million) from Aave and transferred them to an Ethereum address known to interact with centralized exchanges regularly.

Last month, Celsius froze withdrawals due to the recent market downturn, while other crypto firms, Voyager Digital Ltd. and Three Arrows Capital, recently filed for bankruptcy.

According to a report from Blockchain.News, besides clearing debts, the crypto lender has also started the restructuring process.

Celsius has hired new lawyers to advise the troubled cryptocurrency lender on restructuring, according to a report from the Wall Street Journal (WSJ).

The much-needed restructuring plan has come as it seeks to escape the recent turmoil in crypto markets, the WSJ said, citing people familiar with the matter.

According to the WSJ report, Kirkland & Ellis LLP lawyers have been called on board to advise Celsius on options, including a bankruptcy filing.

EquitiesFirst Owes $439 Million In Debt to Celsius Network

EquitiesFirst, an Indianapolis-based specialist finance company best known for lending cash to institutions secured against their stock holdings, is identified as a debtor to the prominent crypto lender Celsius Network. That is according to Celsius’ bankruptcy filings, as reported by Financial Times media outlets.

On Thursday, Celsius CEO Alex Mashinsky stated in a court filing that his firm was owed $439 million by a “private lending platform,” which he did not mention. However, two individuals familiar with the knowledge disclosed that the platform is EquitiesFirst.

The court filing said the relationship between the two companies initially came from deals in which Celsius started borrowing from EquitiesFirst in 2019 on a secured basis to support its business operations.

The relationship expanded and later it turned out that EquitiesFirst owed Celsius amounts worth $509 million on an unsecured basis.

EquitiesFirst had slowly paid down the debt since September last year. Although the firm is steadily paying off the debt, there is still an outstanding loan worth $439 million — made up of 3,765 Bitcoins and $361 million in cash — which are yet to be paid.

“EquitiesFirst is in ongoing conversation with our client and both parties have agreed to extend our obligations,” EquitiesFirst told Financial Times media.

EquitiesFirst, which was founded in 2002, specializes in loans secured against company stock. The firm began lending against cryptocurrencies around 2016.

According to the report, EquitiesFirst’s lending in the crypto landscape was typically at a 60% loan-to-value, secured against cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and Ether.

Efforts to Rescue Business

The funds owed by EquitiesFirst is a huge amount of Celsius’s assets, which hundreds of thousands of its clients will be relying on to recover some of their deposits.

The EquitiesFirst debt, which Celsius had not disclosed before, now provides context to the difficulties the crypto lender encounters as crypto markets plunged hard this year.

On 12th June, Celsius suspended all customer transactions and withdrawals across its networks, citing extreme market conditions.

On Wednesday this week, Celsius filed for bankruptcy protection as it seeks to stabilize its business by restructuring in a manner that maximizes value for all of its stakeholders. In the meantime, Celsius stated that it has $167 million in cash on hand to support operations.

Bitvavo Rejects DCG's 70% Debt Repayment Offer

The cryptocurrency exchange Bitvavo, which is a significant creditor of the financially challenged cryptocurrency startup Digital Currency Group (DCG), has rejected DCG’s proposal of partial debt recovery.

On January 11, 2019, Bitvavo made an official announcement stating that the company had received a counter proposal from DCG, which offered to refund about 70 percent of the total sum owed on terms that were agreeable to Bitvavo.

DCG is only prepared to return a portion of the loan within a time frame that is acceptable to Bitvavo, thus negotiations over the remaining balance amount are currently ongoing with this party.

Bitvavo has highlighted that the present scenario involving DCG does not have any influence on the company’s clients, platform, or services. Bitvavo provides a guarantee for the remaining balance and has thereby assumed the risk that was previously borne by its consumers.

The statement came shortly after Bitvavo made the decision to pre-fund around $290 million in assets locked on DCG so that it would no longer be dependent on the struggling company. The Dutch cryptocurrency exchange said that it has sufficient capacity to continue providing service to its clients without any interruptions.

Despite the fact that DCG is facing a severe liquidity difficulty in the midst of the bear market, the exchange anticipates that it will be able to refund overdue sums. In their most recent statement, Bitvavo noted a scenario that was very similar to the one that the crypto exchange Gemini, which is owned by the Winklevoss brothers, was experiencing.

On January 10, Cameron Winklevoss sent a public letter to the board of directors of DCG, in which he accused CEO Barry Silbert of fraud and demanded that Silbert be replaced in his position as CEO.

After the failure of the FTX cryptocurrency exchange in November 2022, a significant contagion spread across the market, causing big corporations like as DCG and Genesis to be adversely impacted.

It was announced that the Department of Justice of the United States had begun an investigation into DCG in conjunction with the Securities and Exchange Commission, the situation grew even more dangerous for the company.

Zipmex Requests Moratorium Extension in Singapore

Cryptocurrency exchange Zipmex has requested another extension to its moratorium on debt payments in Singapore due to liquidity issues. The firm has filed a request in Singapore’s courts to extend its existing moratorium period by two months. Zipmex plans to use the extra time to plan and reopen Z Wallet withdrawals.

Zipmex initially filed for a moratorium in July, which allowed the company to postpone payments due to its exposure to Celsius, a cryptocurrency lending platform. The exchange suspended withdrawals earlier that month, while CEO Marcus Lim did not deny reports that the firm was facing insolvency. Singapore’s courts granted Zipmex’s moratorium request, giving the company until December 2022 to come up with a restructuring plan.

However, the platform has continued to request extensions on the moratorium, with the most recent one likely pushing its deadlines to June. In an announcement on April 18, Zipmex said it was in negotiations with investors to “maximize returns for customers” following a delay in payments.

It’s unclear which investor Zipmex was referring to in its latest announcement. In March, venture capital firm V Ventures reportedly did not provide a payment of more than $1 million necessary for Zipmex to avoid liquidating certain operations and stop distributing payroll to employees.

Zipmex’s latest request for an extension highlights the challenges faced by cryptocurrency exchanges in a volatile market. The crypto industry has seen significant fluctuations in value over the past year, with Bitcoin alone experiencing a dramatic rise and fall in value. This has led to liquidity issues for some exchanges, as investors are unable to withdraw funds and pay debts.

The company’s struggles also reflect the broader regulatory challenges facing cryptocurrency exchanges. Many countries are grappling with how to regulate the industry, with some governments taking a more restrictive approach. In Singapore, authorities have implemented strict rules for cryptocurrency exchanges, including requiring them to obtain a license from the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS).

Despite these challenges, the cryptocurrency industry continues to attract investors and users around the world. While some exchanges may struggle, others are thriving, and the industry as a whole shows no signs of slowing down. However, as the Zipmex case demonstrates, investors and exchanges must navigate a complex landscape filled with uncertainty and risk.

Exit mobile version