IRS Hoping to Deanonymize Monero and ZCash Privacy Coins to Prevent Cybercrime

The Criminal Investigation Division (CID) of the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) is actively hiring private contractors to study and analyze privacy coins, as there has quite been a lot of fraudulent activities revolving around their usage. 

Monero — a Popular Choice for Fraud

While the world has undergone coronavirus cybercriminals have been hard at work conducting their habitual illicit operations with the help of privacy coins.

Monero (XMR) and Zcash (ZEC) are quite an attractive option for cyber scammers, as they offer more anonymity and privacy than Bitcoin. The IRS is hoping to eventually deanonymize these privacy coins in order to put a halt to cyber fraud.

Why is Monero in Cybercrime?

XMR currently stands at the top of the list, for the most private cryptocurrencies on the market. Monero transactions operate on blockchain technology and are harder to trace, due in part to its ring signature and stealth addresses. Also, since Monero’s ledger is easy-to-access and is public, it is a popular choice that cybercriminals choose in order to carry out their illicit activities.

Zcash a Close Second

Another privacy coin that IRS is hoping to further investigate is Monero’s counter rival, Zcash. ZEC operates by using an anonymity tool called Zero-Knowledge-Proof, which allows users to transact with each other without revealing their true addresses to anyone.

In other words, this makes it hard for the receiver to trace and figure out the identity of the sender, and vice-versa. Because of its end-to-end-encryption property, Zcash users can remain anonymous despite conducting numerous online transactions.

Privacy Coins and Cybercrime

Privacy coins, such as Monero and Zcash, are common cryptocurrencies used in cybercriminal rings. In contrast, Bitcoin, which offers no anonymity, is less attractive to cyber scammers.

Depending on the privacy coin, anonymity levels differ. This type of cryptocurrency is attractive to cybercriminals, because it obfuscates the transacted amount, wallet addresses, the identities of both sender and receiver; it is also hard to trace the transaction trail.

Because of the anonymity offered by privacy coins, fraudulent activities such as tax evasion and money laundering are common with Monero and Zcash.

How the IRS Hopes to End CyberCrime

Based on the Request for Information (RFI) posted by the IRS Criminal Investigation program, private contractors working for them have developed software used to detect suspicious online transactions.

Illicit activities reported by various law enforcement agencies in the past will be gathered and analyzed in detail to prevent future cases of phishing and fraudulent behavior.

US law enforcers are also looking to come up with more innovative technological strategies to trace privacy coins, layer 2 off-chain protocol networks, and side chains. 

Image source: Shutterstock

Bitfinex and Tether Face Market Manipulation Class Action Lawsuit

Roche Freedman, New York-based legal firm, filed a class-action lawsuit on behalf of those who own cryptocurrency against Bitfinex and Tether and others for crypto market manipulation and creating the largest bubble in history.  

In the class-action suit, the New York-based legal firm alleged that Bitfinex and Tether had been involved in manipulating markets and concealing illicit proceeds, as stated in the tweet by the law firm’s founding partner, Kyle Roche.   

The complaint filed with the United States District Court in the Southern District of New York stated that Bitfinex and Tether were involved in a sophisticated scheme to defraud investors. The complaint said that the action concerns a “part-fraud, part-pump-and-dump, and part-money laundering.”  

Tether’s asset backing notion debunked  

The document further notes that Tether claims “that the number of [USDT] tokens in circulation will always equate to the dollars in its bank account.” However, this claim was a lie, according to Roche Freedman.   

The law firm claimed that Tether “issued extraordinary amounts of unbacked USDT to manipulate cryptocurrency prices. Because the market believed the like that one USDT equaled one US dollar, Bitfinex and Tether had the power to, and did manipulate the market on an unprecedented scale to profit from boom-and-bust cycles they created.” 

Image via Bitcoin Magazine

Blockchain-Based Invoices Reached $1 Billion USD in China with 10 Million Invoices

Shenzhen’s pilot blockchain technology invoice system has reached a new milestone. The program known as ‘fapiao’ which allows the Chinese government to track purchases and prevent tax evasion, has just issued its 10 millionth invoice.

This comes from over 7,500 companies using the e-invoice system to date. The program has now been active for over 15 months, and growth is seen in major sectors including transport, catering, parking, retail and internet services. These sectors make up some of the 100+ sectors involved.

Shenzhen issued its first e-invoice in August 2018, totaling an aggregate invoice amount of almost $1 billion USD to date.

With China ramping up more blockchain services and transitioning the technology into business, fapiao may just be the roll-out needed for all other Chinese cities. Based on the 15 months the program has been running, it seems that many sectors have been able to adapt and benefit from the system.

Tencent, a major company in the crypto space, has also been given the green light to issue similar invoices. This shows that the Chinese Tax Bureau is open to the adoption and usage of more companies following the e-system.

Leveraging blockchain, China’s main aim is to combat fraud including fake receipts, that has been a problem coming from specialized sellers looking to make fast money.

China will continue to implement control features, showing how governments can leverage distributed ledger technology to fight against criminal activity.

Image via Shutterstock

New Crypto Fraud Scheme In South Korea: What Rules Are in Place to Stop False Advertising?

Corner Up, a crypto platform in South Korea, has had high-ranking staff indicted for multiple cases of fraud in the market. 

The Ponzi scheme disguised as a crypto platform managed to acquire over $380 million USD for the CEO and other company staff. Corner Up was promising estimated returns of up to 200% to investors for each investment made. 

Targeting many individuals and organizations who are not specialists in the market, the scam company used false marketing and claims of partnership with extremely high profile names, including President of South Korea, Moon Jae-In as an ambassador. 

Crypto marketing is certainly an area of concern, with many large companies including Google and Facebook still limiting, or completing baning any advertisement that will ask viewers to invest, save or store assets with any particular company. 

Facebook has updated their terms, to ensure that ads should be safe, and that we build for people first. Misleading or deceptive ads have no place on Facebook.

They do however accept that with permission, companies or persons may advertise events, education, and news where no product or services are on offer regarding cryptocurrency. 

Around the world, there are many social media networks, search engines and powerful tools to market cryptocurrency. With fraud and countless scams continuing to happen, is there a need for more rules, or more education for the public?

Image via Shutterstock

Risk Assurance Group and Telecom Analytics Provider Combat Fraud with Blockchain

Subex, a notable telecom analytics solution provider, has partneredwith the Risk & Assurance Group (RAG) for blockchain-enabled fraud management solutions.

Through the strategic alliance, Subex will be incorporated into the RAG Wangiri Blockchain Consortium, whose intention is leveraging on blockchain technology in gathering real-time industry threat intelligence about fraudsters. As a result, Subex customers will be availed with blockchain-powered fraud combatting solutions. 

Presently, the consortium comprises of some of the world’s leading Communications Service Providers (CSP) from Asia, Africa, Europe, and North America, such as AT&T Inc., Deutsche Telecom AG, among others.

Fraud in the Telecom Industry

Fraud has emerged to be a severe predicament to telecom operators as the loss of billions of dollars yearly has become inevitable. 

Fraudsters are continually using various technological advancements to outsmart conventional fraud management controls. 

By collaborating with the RAG Wangiri Blockchain Consortium, Subex seeks to eradicate this challenge by integrating blockchain-based solutions that will prompt data exchange in real-time. 

Expressly, it will present its customers with a cryptographically secure and decentralized blockchain ledger of fraud-linked information that is expected to tackle fraud issues. 

Tribhovandas Bhimji Zaveri (TBZ), a famed jewelry brand in India, is eyeing technological innovations, such as blockchain, virtual reality, and artificial intelligence (AI), to authenticate its jewelry.

Image via Kevin Spencer

Telegram Resists the SEC Court Order to Reveal Financial Details of 2018 ICO

A recent court filing initiated by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) compels Telegram to reveal bank records and other transactional documents showing how the raised funds have been used in the last two years.The filing stated: “Plaintiff respectfully moves to compel Defendants to answer questions and provide documents regarding the amounts, sources, and use of funds raised from investors in connection with the unregistered sale of securities at issue in this case, Defendants are now refusing to disclose the bank records concerning how they have spent the $1.7 billion they raised from investors in the past two years and to answer questions about the disposition of investor funds.” 

In the early sale rounds in 2018, Telegram raised $1.7 billion for the development of its TON blockchain. It is worth noting that the company advised investors against participating in the rounds, yet many of them were able to access the tokens through external parties before the launch of Telegram’s blockchain.The SEC summoned the company to court for alleged claims that the tokens fell under the category of securities, which the company failed to make known to the regulators. As a result of this lawsuit, the company has equally been compelled to delay the release of its blockchain launch. 

Image via Shutterstock 

How Blockchain Can Mitigate Electoral Malpractices

For elections to be credible, they ought to be free and fair. Nevertheless, the voting process may be marred with malpractices, and this hinders transparency. This has been an issue that has affected many electoral processes across the globe because the will of the people is, at times, jeopardized in favor of egocentric motives. For instance, it is allegedthat the 2016 US Presidential Elections between Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump were hacked to favor the latter. 

Realistically, voter fraud has been wreaking havoc across the globe, and this has compromised efficiency. For instance, according to the Pew Center on states, 2.75 million Americans are registeredto vote in more than one state. Blockchain is being touted to avert electoral malpractices and voter fraud based on the distributed ledger technology (DLT) presented.

Blockchain offers anonymous voting

A vote ought to be considered as high-value data. As a result, it should be safeguarded in the best way possible. Moreover, voting should be anonymous, as voters should not show their political preferences or identity to the public. Information stored in a blockchain network is decentralized and encrypted, and this makes it ideal for electoral processes.  

For instance, in October 2019, the Uruguay Digital Party deployedblockchain technology to revamp its internal voting process. It achieved this objective by partnering with Aeternity, a blockchain startup, as it wanted to make voting anonymous, transparent, and accessible. 

The fact that blockchain systems are transparent and immutable or tamper-proof has been one of the stepping stones of making them favorable in voting processes. For example, Horizon State,a tech-firm, launched revolutionary decision-making and voting blockchain structure in the form of an incorruptible, anonymous, and secure digital ballot box.

Expressly, participants are expected to utilize decision tokens (HST) to make their votes from a PC or mobile phone that is logged into an immutable blockchain used in the verification of election outcomes. This approach eliminates any electoral malpractices, such as tampering, recording errors, or manipulations. 

Blockchain eradicates hacked voting

Hackers, at times, take advantage of internet connectivity to launch attacks that comprise votes. This can prove to be detrimental as voter apathy may rise because people may become less concerned about elections. 

In recent times, hackers have become crafty to the extent that they manipulate voter registration databases by removing voters perceived to support a particular candidate. In the process, they swing a closely contested election. For instance, in the 2016 US presidential election, Russian intelligence officers have been accused of breaching voter registration databases. 

Hackers usually exploit vulnerabilities in tabulation systems and voting machinery to launch their attacks. In 2017, one of the biggest hacker conferences in the world dubbed DEF CON availed a voting machine village, and hackers were required to exploit and hunt cyber vulnerabilities in election office networks, voter registration databases, and voting machines. 

The event organizers noted,“By the end of the conference, every piece of equipment in the Voting Village was effectively breached in some manner. Participants with little prior knowledge and only limited tools and resources were quite capable of undermining the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of these systems.”

A blockchain-enabled voting process can be instrumental in averting hackers as they will have to attack all nodes to gain entry, and this is nearly impossible. As a result, voter fraud is prevented based on blockchain’s notable characteristics, such as accountability, immutability, and transparency.

Blockchain-based voting taking shape

In 2018, West Virginia emerged as the first US state to permitblockchain-powered internet voting in primary elections. Blockchain was deployed because it offered a safe interface needed in eliminating voter fraud and boosting turnout. As a result, it enables citizens to cast their votes while abroad. Blockchain-based voting not only eliminates electoral malpractices but also allows people to vote irrespective of time and distance. 

In October 2019, three Indian computer engineering students, from Malla Reddy Engineering College for Women, were involved in the creationof a blockchain-enabled voting platform that permitted votes to be cast online as compared to manual procedures of standing in a poll line. The students acknowledged that this initiative was prompted by their urge to propel democratic processes and eliminate voting challenges and fraud in urban areas. 

The notion of blockchain having the capability of protecting personal data was echoed by Brittany Kaiser, the Cambridge Analytica scandal whistleblower, during an interviewat the World Economic Forum. She noted that personal data was one of the most valuable assets in the world, and blockchain could come in handy in addressing data protection issues. In elections, blockchain-powered systems ensure immutability and transparency in the voting process, and this eliminates challenges, such as electoral malpractices and voter fraud. 

Image via Shutterstock

Creating Corruption-Free Ecosystems with Blockchain: A Study

The Roman Empire was one of the greatest successes of human civilization. For most of its 1,000-years plus existence, Rome conquered and expanded across vast swathes of Europe, Asia, and North Africa, creating cultural, architectural, and societal imprints that last to the present day.

But such empire, mighty as it was, entered into a decline that led to its downfall around 480 AD.

The reasons for the fall of the Roman Empire are many and complex. Historians have debated the issue for centuries, and have put forward ideas such as invasion for well-organized and determined tribes, military overreach, cultural decay, and very significantly, corruption. 

One can argue that the Roman Empire’s decline began within itself, and more specifically, from the ruling classes. The rise of an autocratic system -which was, by and large, supported by the populace-, meant the advent of rigged elections, secret agendas, and political murders, among many other misdeeds. 

Corruption is, of course, not exclusive to the Roman Empire. Corruption is a man-made issue that has blighted many cultures, countries, and societies throughout history. And to a large extent, systemic and state-sponsored or abetted corruption and dishonesty are one of the most significant problems in today’s world.

The different forms of corruption

Roman law had a specific word to define political corruption: Ambitus. The term specifically referred to attempts to influence the outcome of an election through criminal practices, such as bribery, for example. Ambitus might be an archaic term, but its meaning certainly resonates in today’s political and social media landscape.

But corruption can take many other forms: Extortion, cronyism, cash-for-favors, slush funds, and so on. When it takes hold and becomes institutionalized, corruption develops into an endemic and systemic problem. Those living outside the inner circle can even come to accept it as part and parcel of daily life and live in resignation.

Deeply embedded corruption has a great detrimental effect on society. It may inhibit economic growth, for example, as funds earmarked for social projects might be redirected to malefactors. And corruption has a profound impact on foreign investment and business developments, as trust and prospects of prosperity are simply not there.

Corruption is an exclusively human trait. Animals kill each other for sustenance and to preserve their own species, but never for percentages. So when the very condition of humanity lies at the root of the problem, how can the riddle be solved?

Blockchain solutions for a very human problem

Malfeasance spreads across many shades of grey, and rooting out the bad actors can be difficult, depending on how widespread complicity is. 

One of the main allies of corruption at State and official agency level is the perception of impunity and anonymity by those engaged in the practice. In other words, those acting dishonesty can hide their deeds behind a wall of silence or veiled threats, which may, in some cases be abetted, or even encouraged by their superiors. Existing anti-corruption laws and legislations might not be particularly effective either, for the same reason.

One of blockchain technology’s inherent traits is transparency. Every node in the network can see every transaction, which instantly removes the possibility of interference. John P. Conley, a gifted economist, game theorist, and blockchain pioneer, proves this point, ‘Let’s take Bitcoin’s Proof-of-Work concept. Let’s say that we have 30,000 nodes that are validating transactions. How are they ever going to coordinate together and do something dishonest? The distribution of the nodes that are validating gives inherent stability. At least half would have to be dishonest for the system to break, but the notion that 15,000 nodes would coordinate to do something dishonest is ridiculous.’

Blockchain ensures that bad actors can no longer rely on anonymity to conceal their actions. Data stored on the blockchain is also immutable. In other words, it cannot be changed, nor can it be tampered with. Let’s take cadastral data, for example. That is, data about boundaries, property lines, and ownership. 

Cadastral corruption is not unheard of, particularly in emerging economies. Corrupt officials might alter land ownership or boundary records for their own benefit, or those of their cronies or associates. A blockchain framework would eliminate this type of crime by keeping a fully transparent and unchangeable block of land records.

Creating a decentralized anti-corruption framework built on the blockchain

Some define corruption as the abuse of entrusted power for private gain, and this is true. But fighting against it requires a more holistic approach.

Corruption often involves a cadre of individuals working in complicity, whereby one or two people might control a database, a set of bank accounts, or access to sensitive or confidential information, while the rest cover the tracks. The very centralization of today’s IT, banking, or land registry frameworks becomes its weakness.

Blockchain creates a decentralized environment that would remove the single point of failure conundrum, as data would no longer reside in just one or two easy-to-manipulate locations.

Conclusion

Society as a whole still has a long way to go to eliminate corruption from its fabric. It is, as we saw earlier, a purely human trait, much like greed or envy. And a man-made problem requires a man-made solution, such as blockchain.

The technology can help lift the veil of corruption through transparency, immutability, and decentralization, which are precisely the traits that make blockchain be.

 

UK Law Enforcers Blow the Whistle on Bitcoin Fraudsters Taking Advantage of Coronavirus Outbreak

As the coronavirus pandemic continues to wreak havoc, having claimed more than 3,000 lives and infecting more than 100,000 people globally, tension has become inevitable. The UK police have raised the alarm on fraudsters swindling Britons by demanding Bitcoin payments amid coronavirus scare. 

Egocentric motives

The UK law enforcers noted that scammers have been latching on to the coronavirus pandemic with fake emails purporting to come from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to defraud the public in the pretense of selling them necessities, such as face masks. 

Some Britons have fallen prey to the Bitcoin fraudsters as they have lost £800,000, approximately $1 million. A case that was singled out entailed a person being scammed £15,000, nearly $19,500 for the delivery of face masks, and this did not happen. 

As a result, the National Fraud Intelligence Bureau (NFIB), a police unit mandated with gathering and analyzing fraud intelligence and financially-motivated cybercrime, gave the UK public a myriad of caution after it identified 21 fraud cases linked to coronavirus in February 2020. 

NFIB ascertained, “They claim to be able to provide the recipient with a list of coronavirus infected people in their area. In order to access this information, the victim needs to click on a link, which leads to a malicious website, or is asked to make a payment in Bitcoin.”

The fraudsters have been coercing people to make Bitcoin payments by sending texts and emails with the pretense that they are coming from research organizations affiliated with the World Health Organization (WHO) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Blockchain’s efforts in tackling coronavirus 

NFIB has, therefore, advised the populace not to click on attachments or links in suspicious emails. Nevertheless, blockchain is being regarded as a game-changer in tackling the coronavirus epidemic.

For instance, blockchain is increasingly being leveraged by China to combat the outbreak by tracking the supply of virus prevention materials, getting a public opinion, and managing medical data. Last month, Shanzong, a blockchain-enabled donation tracking platform, was established in China to boost efficiency and the transparency of giving.

Image via Shutterstock

Accused Co-Founder of $9 Million Crypto Ponzi Scheme Declares Not Guilty in Court

The Co-Founder of Zima Digital Assets, Zachary Salter and his associate, 28-year-old John Caruso jointly declared not guilty to charges of money laundering and conspiracy to attempt wire fraud during arraignment in an Arizona court on March 4.

A report explained the criminal charges leveled against the pair who allegedly operated a cryptocurrency-based investment scheme that was eventually used to defraud their customers of a huge $9 million now referred to as a classical Ponzi scheme besides the notorious OneCoin episode.

Mode of operation that aided the success of the scheme

Approximately $1.9 million in deposits were systematically returned to early investors as assumed investment returns. The purported profits served as a means to validate the scheme to lure in participants which eventually resulted in a further wave of deposits to the platform.

The remaining funds totaling $7 million was spent in a lavish manner by the co-founders who now stand trials. Vacationing, purchase of luxurious cars, rentals of private jets, and gambling habits were the highlights of both accused. Despite flaunting such a lavish lifestyle on social media, the pair claimed now taxable income.

The accused successfully defrauded more than 90 investors including elderly citizens and former professional baseball players. Both men were arrested on Jan. 30 this year and are now charged by criminal complaint with conspiracy to commit wire fraud and money laundering among the charges leveled against them

Guilty or not Guilty?

The indictment included allegations of false statements in investor contracts and misinterpretations in direct messages to clients and both have pleaded not guilty. Caruso separately pleaded not guilty during his initial arraignment on Feb. 26. He also has a pending criminal record and was last released from prison in 2017.

Having pleaded not guilty, both men will now face a jury trial on July 4, 2020. If found guilty of the charges leveled against them, Salter and Caruso will have the properties allegedly obtained from the Ponzi scheme forfeited.

Image via Shutterstock

Exit mobile version