Fed Chair Powell Asserts Money Supply is for Central Banks not Private Sector

Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell asserted that the private sector has no place in money issuance, and by extension the development of a Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC).

The House Committee on Financial Services met again yesterday, and an interesting exchange took place between Fed Chairman Jerome Powell and Representative Tom Emmer (R-MN) over whether CBDC should be developed in a private-public partnership.

In the hearing on June 17, as the topic turned to CBDC, Chairman Powell made his feelings clear that he did not view the private sector as having any place in money issuance.

Where is the Digital Dollar?

In a previous open hearing by the House Committee On Financial services the Honorable Christopher Giancarlo once again advocated for the use of a Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) as an effective means of stimulus distribution and added that China is gaining a lot of ground in this regard.

But how far off is a United States CBDC or digital dollar? That was the question posed by Representative Emmer, a ranking member of the Fintech Task Force, to the Fed Chairman as he questioned, “What substantive recent actions has the Fed taken to understand and experiment with this technology?” 

While Powell responded to the inquiry, his answer was very vague and diplomatic. He simply said that the US Government has an obligation to the public to keep them up to speed with innovation. He added, “If this (CBDC) is something that is going to be good for the United States economy and for the world’s reserve currency, which is the dollar, then we need to be there and we need to understand it first and best.”

No Place for the Private Sector in Money Supply

Later in the hearing, Powell also responded to the initiatives of the Digital Dollar Project, which is headed up by former CFTC Chairman Giancarlo—who has expressed a need for the digital dollar or a CBDC to be developed through a private-public partnership.

Powell clearly expressed that neither he nor the Federal Reserve were interested in such a collaboration. He said, “The private sector is not involved in creating the money supply. That’s something that the central bank does.” He added, “I don’t really think the public would welcome the idea that private employees who are not accountable solely to the public good would be responsible for something this important.”

It is unclear what accountability Powell refers to, as the US government continues to print money from thin air with seemingly little thought for the consequences on the dollar’s value and the incoming inflation that will be felt globally.

Protecting the Dollar

The response of Chairman Powell regarding the private sector being involved in money issuance should come as no surprise as the US Government has, throughout their history, gone to extreme measures to retain control of the defacto global currency in the US Dollar.

The inception of cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin, which, was essentially built to potentially destabilize and displace the central source of power for our governments—their control over traditional financial systems and monetary issuance—has been a growing concern to the United States.

US authorities and regulators have famously hammered Facebook’s Libra project into submission as a token supported by two billion users was again too much of a threat to their monetary control. US regulators also clearly encroached on the rights of other sovereign nations when they banned the distribution of Grams and the launch of the TON, not just in the US but globally. 

President Trump has been incredibly outspoken on the subject of Bitcoin and also believed Facebook’s Libra to have little standing or dependability. Last year he was quoted saying, “We have only one real currency in the USA. It is by far the most dominant currency anywhere in the world, and it will always stay that way. It is called the United States Dollar!”

New Money Theory: Understanding the Fundamental Internal and External Factors of Money

In brief

We introduce the internal and external factors of money to explain the concept of money systematically. Internal factors: money form, money issuance standard, and money flow. External factors: power, evolution, competition, and competition output. 
Currently, money is an extension of power. Money has a huge influence on shaping humanity’s collective values. With blockchain, humans, for the first time in our history have the power to design money with goodwill, while also removing the absolute power of institutional money issuers and “trusted third parties”.

Money has always had a fundamental influence on the development of the world and society’s values. Money is a major incentive for our economic society. Everybody knows the importance of money, but how money is created and achieves its value still remains a mystery for most people.

A real consideration of what makes something valuable can be mindblowing and the factors can range from spiritual to utility, but often throughout history, forms of value have been connected to scarcity, things that were difficult to acquire or mine like gold, silver, and diamonds. In the Napoleonic era, aluminum was seen as far more valuable than gold as it was more scarce and difficult to acquire at the time. Napoleon’s crown was even made from aluminum to highlight his supreme power as Emperor, but, by today’s standards, the prospect of aluminum being more valuable than gold is quite absurd. The design of currency can drive humans toward a collective staple value, as was the case with Gold for thousands of years and later on Gold-backed currency issuance. Blockchain technology, however, creates a new system of value.

Through Blockchain technology, we can create a whole new system of value and even design a new currency with the purpose of bringing true monetary freedom to humans for the first time in their history. To understand the essence of money and its influence on human society, in this article, we introduce six factors to describe money in two categories: internal factors and external factors. 

Internal and External Factors

Internal factors: money form, money issuance standard, money flow. Those reflect the essence of money.

External factors: power evolution, competition, competition output. Those reflect the nature of humans in terms of money.

In the previous post “Blockchain Brings Monetary and Financial Freedom”, we have already discussed the internal factors that give money value. In this article, we map the relationship between money and its influence on human society, in terms of human incentive, human nature, human welfare, and more—the external factors. We investigate and demystify money in a combination of internal and external factors.

On power evolution and money form

When gold was used as money in forms of gold coins or gold bars, everybody had a consensus on gold itself. No central authority or agency could influence the value of Gold.Gradually, central and sovereign authorities achieved the power of standardization of gold and maintained the power of supervising thereafter. But gold ultimately proved to be quite inconvenient for trade, so humanity progressed to the gold-backed paper money. We trusted in the paper money issuer and one type of credit was introduced.

Then speculation prevailed. Paper money was not fully backed by gold. The concept of ” leverage” and another type of credit were introduced and we need to trust the issuer. This is actually what typical commercial banks have been doing. We can say that it is the inherently physical defect of gold. And leave us to design a better currency without such weakness.

Bitcoin is quite different from traditional electronic money as its ownership is guaranteed by private key and bitcoin network security which related to computing power. The technology guaranteed ownership is different from ownership guaranteed by law as law. We can bitcoin’s ownership “absolute ownership”.

On power evolution and money issuance standard

Initially, take gold as an example, the issuance of money is decentralized, everybody can do gold mining. There were once a few gold rushes in history. The standardization of gold gave the authority the power of supervision. Then the authority provided the market with “alternative coins”. It is the coin with less gold or mixed with other heavy metals. Then the authority introduced the partial power of issuance. As mentioned above, paper money needs to be backed by gold reserve, be it full reserve or not full reserve. But what would happen if we removed the gold reverse? Well, the money seems to be issued from the thin air. This is exactly how money is issued in our current monetary system. In other words, money issuance is backed by national credit. And authority monopolized the issuance power. You know it is illegal to print paper money by yourself because of no national credit in it.

This money issuance standard began after 1973 when the US defaulted its US dollar for gold promise and the fixed exchange rate became fluctuated. This marked the collapse of the Bretton Woods system. It was not a money issuance perfect update but a national default from fears that the gold reserve could drain dry. As the US dollar is the de facto world currency, now virtually all money is US dollar-based money issuance standard. The money issuance power transited from distributed to monopoly and absolute power.

Where there is a dependence, there is a risk of being influenced or enslaved. In an international relationship, there is a phenomenon where one countries monetary is highly influenced by another country. We call it “money colony”.

Will the money issuance right get back to the general public in the long run? Hayek in his famous book “Denationalization of Money” once conceived the vision of private money. This type of private money is different from a period of the gold standard when the gold is the consensus and private miners are reliable providers of gold money. We can devise a new money creation mechanism that has consensus among all people and the creation will benefit all in general. Bitcoin a good start.

On power evolution and money flow

Money flow refers to payment, settlement, remittance, etc. Most money flow is in the hands of traditional financial institutions. In general, the service of money flow is high. Traditional financial institutions have monopolized the money flow system. Although we have witnessed the emerging fintech industry that has made money flow a bit more convenient, it still has much space to improve.

With blockchain, we can reduce the concept set. And the implementation is much simpler. Blockchain provides an alternative to traditionally US dollar-based settlement networks. Blockchain also provides an alternative to the current payment network globally. With the power of money flow transitioned to blockchain-based, we can expect an apparent cost reduction in money flow.

On competition field and money issuance standard

We categorize competition field into consensus-based and non-consensus based (or credit-based)

If there is a consensus on the form of money like with the gold standard, the competition evolves into who can get the most money. And we are happy to utilize new technologies to improve efficiency in gold mining. Sometimes, we may even engage in all out conflict in seizing the gold mining field as well.

For bitcoin, it is Proof-of-Work (POW) based. The competition on bitcoin creation is reduced to computing power and power consumption.

For fiat money, there is actually no consensus on money. The money issuance is based on national credit, it is the national credit standard. The fiat money is forced in circulation by government nationally and internationally its values are determined by its adoption or requirement.

This money issuance standard is quite different from gold standard. The competition is a much likely zero-sum game. This can be seen as money colony.

For national credit standards, money is forced into circulation by government nationally and internationally its values are determined by its adoption or requirement. This is quite different from the gold standard. The competition is a zero-sum game. This can be seen as a money colony.

On competition out and money issuance standard

Different competitions lead to different results and side effects.

In the era of the gold standard, we definitely got more and more gold. And as a side effect, we created more efficient ways of mining gold and improving mining tools. Under national credit issuance, actually there is no consensus on money as there was with the gold standard. This standard easily leads to conflict in the money adoption field, like oil, resource, countries. To maintain the dominance or zone of influence, military operation may be incurred. Typically currencies like USD, EURO, and RMB all have tried its way to increase influence in terms of money adoption or requirement. On bitcoin’s POW, we get back to a money consensus with unified rules for all. It would waste power and computing power in some sense. But we can guess computing power is the most important factor in a future society where AI and smart machines prevail. Competition on computing power and power efficiency would accelerate the development of our society.

Design money with human goodwill

can we design new money issuance standards for a better world? Is the human goodwill currency following God’s expectation?

Bitcoin’s POW raised concerns about waste of computing power and power. The key here is how to reduce the cost to contribution instead of wasting of computing power and power.

Let’s reversal thinking. We first focus on the goal of competition output, our goal here is the development of human society. Let’s go deeper, What’s the most important and most basic and stable factor(s) that serves for the development of human society? We proposed: take these factor(s) as the input of money issuance. The money issuance standard problem is reduced to the contribution of the development of human society. The is completely new. Since our society is driven by value incentives and we have redefined value creation, this may lead to the reconstruction of our value system. And since basic money is mainly from machine-based algorithms. It shifts our focus from “human-oriented” to “machine-oriented”. This is large cooperation on a global scale. We need more research on this topic.

Author: Kun Hu, Francis Lau

Editor: Lucas Cacioli

Japan’s Financial Regulator Proposes New Legislations, Limiting Stablecoin Issuance to Banks

On Monday, December 6, Japan’s Financial Services Agency (FSA) announced that it will propose legislation in 2022 that seeks to limit the issuance of stablecoin to banks and wire transfer companies.

The major financial market regulator stated that limiting the stablecoin issuances will assist in reducing down risks, as banks have the responsibility of protecting customers assets by law.

The new proposed regulations by FSA are likely to prevent firms like Tether (USDT), which does not operate as banks and is only regulated in the British Virgin Island, from carrying out business with Japanese customers.

The new regulations aim to tighten the agency’s oversight on the stablecoins market in order to protect consumers from potential risks from cryptocurrency stablecoins such as Tether. The legislation will also include steps to prevent money laundering through stablecoins by giving the regulator additional oversight over intermediaries like wallet providers and others involved in stablecoins and also introducing additional know-your-customer (KYC) measures. In this way, the FSA wants to tighten regulations in areas like preventing the transfer of criminal proceeds, verifying user identities, and reporting suspicious transactions for both wallet providers and firms issuing stablecoins.

The Competition Between Private Stablecoins and CBDCs

The development by Japan’s FSA proposing legislation to restrict stablecoin issuance comes at a time when private stablecoins compete directly with Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDC) in their adoption. The Bank of Japan is working on rolling out the digital yen by the end of next year. In January, a group of more than 70 major Japanese firms, including Mitsubishi, are expected to start trialling the Central bank digital currency (CBDC), the digital yen, which is reported to function like bank deposits.

Meanwhile, the latest development by FSA is related to a similar proposal in the U.S. In November, the U.S. President’s Working Group on financial markets, together with other regulators, including the Office of The Comptroller of The Currency (OCC), published a report on stablecoins that contained recommendations to treat stablecoin providers like banks.

The U.S. Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen chaired the Working Group report that calls for legislation to make stablecoins subjected to appropriate federal prudential oversight on a comprehensive and consistent basis, including legislation requiring stablecoin providers to be issued depository institutions.

According to Yellen, stablecoins pose risks to the payment system and risks of the concentration of economic power. She, therefore, proposes the need for Stablecoins to be regulated the same way as issuers of similar services such as banks.

Citi Partners with World Bank on Euroclear's DLT Platform for Digitally Native Note Issuance

Citi’s Issuer Services, a segment of Securities Services, acted as the Issuing and Paying Agent for the first Digitally Native Note (DNN) issuance under English Law through Euroclear’s Digital Financial Market Infrastructure (D-FMI) distributed ledger technology (DLT) platform. The transaction involved a EUR 100 million, 3-year DNN issued by the World Bank – International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (IBRD) and was listed on the Luxembourg Stock Exchange.

The Significance of Digitally Native Note Issuance

The issuance and settlement of DNNs on a T0 (same-day) basis mark a pivotal advancement in the bond sector, laying the groundwork for a fully digital transaction lifecycle. This initiative demonstrates a scalable model that merges the merits of digitization with existing bond accessibility and liquidity. It showcases how blockchain technology can mesh with current capital market frameworks, aiming at enhanced efficiency and growth avenues for debt capital market players as the D-FMI infrastructure evolves.

A Multi-Year Collaborative Effort

The initiative is a result of a multi-year collaborative effort among key industry stakeholders including Citi, Euroclear, and IBRD. It aims to establish a robust digital infrastructure for the issuance of DNNs. Andrew Mulley, EMEA Head of Citi’s Issuer Services, highlighted the initiative’s potential to revolutionize the debt capital market operations. Moreover, Ryan Marsh, Global Head of Blockchain, Digital Assets & Innovation for Citi Securities Services, echoed this sentiment, hinting at a series of digital bond initiatives in the pipeline.

Reflecting on Past and Future Digital Initiatives

Lieve Mostrey, Euroclear Group CEO, and Jorge Familiar, Vice President and Treasurer, World Bank, also expressed their enthusiasm for the digital venture. This initiative follows the World Bank’s earlier blockchain bond “bond-i,” further propelling the digitization journey of debt capital markets. Citi continues its endeavor in digital asset solutions, aligning with its strategic objectives and risk tolerance, leveraging a unified technological framework for innovative solutions in digital money, trade, securities, custody, asset servicing, and collateral mobility.

Citi Securities Services at a Glance

Citi Securities Services, boasting about US $28 trillion of assets under custody, administration, and trust, offers an array of securities services solutions tailored to meet clients’ demands. With an expansive proprietary network over 60 markets, it stands as a robust cross-border support for clients, manifesting Citi’s overarching capability in managing a broad spectrum of financial products and services across nearly 160 countries and jurisdictions.

Exit mobile version