tom emmer - Pwim.Net

US Rep. Tom Emmer Fears Criticism of Digital Payment Innovation May Repress Progress

In a congressional hearing which was held on Jan. 30, US Representative Tom Emmer has expressedhis concerns about the excessive criticism of innovations in digital payment, saying that it may repress its progress.

The constraints faced by digital payments

The US Rep. further elaborated on his fears over regulations which he believes will stifle the growth of innovative solutions: “There’s a whole environment out there of brilliant, genius, young people who are coming up with new ways to transfer value every single day,” he further emphasized, saying. “I worry that we’re going to crush that entrepreneurial spirit and that advancement.”

In a meeting comprising of several US representatives from the Financial Services Committee, the Fintech Task Force sat for a hearing which was on Jan. 30; the meeting was given a title ‘Is cash still king? Reviewing the Rise of Mobile Payments.”

The group sat for an intensive session of discussion, and they also exchanged comments with several witnesses. Usman Ahmed, PayPal Head of Global Public Policy and the US Faster Payments Council’s Executive Director, Kim Ford, were among the witnesses during this session.

A defense on cryptocurrency’s behalf

During the session, Emmer singled out the senior policy counsel for Consumer Reports, Christina Tetreault, with his questions, which led to further discussions in favor of the various crypto assets available for different use cases.

“Although you only mentioned Libra, which is not itself a cryptocurrency, I would hope that you more fully explored these innovations,” Emmer continued, mentioning “the opportunities that they provide to both built a financial future for individuals, but also to empower individuals to control the value of their own assets, separate from government control.”

The entire session appeared to be fruitful and lasted for about two hours, touching on the different issues and concerns of all the parties present.

Regardless of Emmer’s concerns, the growing number of severe and mature discussions regarding digital assets and blockchain is a small victory in itself. As recently reported by Blockchain.News, Presidential candidate Andrew Yang was outspoken on the need to clear the mess of “hodgepodge” regulation. He also cited the dangers of deterring innovation.

Image via Shutterstock

Tom Emmer Accuses SEC Chair of Exceeding Authority, Detrimental to Americans, Citing Ripple Case

In a bold move, House Majority Whip Tom Emmer has publicized his criticism of Gary Gensler, the Chair of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), accusing him of expanding his authoritative reach in ways that are not favorable to the American populace.

Representing Minnesota’s 6th District, Emmer took to social platforms Twitter to voice his concerns. He pointedly commented on Gensler’s approach, stating it has expanded the Administrative State in ways that negatively impact Americans. Furthermore, Emmer underscored the need for Congress to harness all tools at their disposal, particularly the appropriations process, to check Gensler’s perceived misuse of taxpayer resources.

This development comes amid a broader debate concerning the SEC’s stance on digital assets and cryptocurrency regulations. The primary focus remains on achieving a balance between consumer protection, fostering innovation, and nurturing the growth of the digital finance arena.

While the full implications of Emmer’s statements remain to be seen, they add a significant layer to the ongoing discourse surrounding the future trajectory of digital assets and their regulations in the U.S.

Emmer’s recent challenges toward Gensler and the SEC are not isolated. He has previously criticized the SEC’s policy on cryptocurrencies. On September 3, 2023, as reported by Blockchain.News, Emmer remarked on the SEC’s legal setbacks against Ripple and Grayscale, suggesting a misguided regulatory stance on crypto. Highlighting the SEC’s losses, he tweeted about the evident challenges faced by the regulatory body, hinting at a questionable future.

This consistent position by Emmer has roots in earlier expressions of disapproval. Stressing the importance of checks and balances, he quoted a previous tweet underlining the DC Court of Appeals decision favoring Grayscale on August 29, 2023. As early as November 4, 2021, Emmer had addressed a letter to Gensler, pointing out inconsistencies in the SEC’s treatment of Bitcoin-focused ETFs.

Emmer’s continuous critiques, in conjunction with the legal challenges faced by the SEC, raise questions about the current regulatory approach. His comments suggest the debate on crypto regulation in the U.S. is far from settled.

Disclaimer & Copyright Notice: The content of this article is for informational purposes only and is not intended as financial advice. Always consult with a professional before making any financial decisions. This material is the exclusive property of Blockchain.News. Unauthorized use, duplication, or distribution without express permission is prohibited. Proper credit and direction to the original content are required for any permitted use.

Tom Emmer's Nonpartisan Amendment to Limit SEC's Enforcement on Digital Assets Passes House

U.S. Representative Tom Emmer, currently serving as the GOP Majority Whip, has been a prominent figure in the debate over the regulation of digital assets. His legislative efforts have consistently focused on clarifying and limiting the regulatory scope of agencies like the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in the digital asset space. Emmer’s stance reflects a broader push within certain political circles to establish clearer legal frameworks for cryptocurrencies and related technologies, aiming to encourage innovation while providing investor protection.

On November 9, 2023, Emmer’s latest nonpartisan amendment, designed to restrain the SEC from using taxpayer funds for enforcement actions against the digital asset industry, was passed in the House of Representatives. This amendment comes at a crucial time when the SEC, under the leadership of Gary Gensler, has been intensifying scrutiny and enforcement actions in the cryptocurrency sector.

The relationship between Emmer and SEC Chair Gary Gensler has been marked by disagreements over the SEC’s approach to digital asset regulation. Emmer has been vocal in criticizing what he perceives as the SEC’s overreach and lack of clear regulatory guidelines, which, according to him, stifles innovation in the burgeoning digital asset market. Gensler, on the other hand, has advocated for robust SEC oversight in the sector, citing investor protection and market integrity as top priorities.

Emmer’s amendment puts a temporary halt on SEC’s enforcement actions in the digital asset domain, pending the passage of specific legislation that defines the SEC’s regulatory authority. This move is seen by many as a bid to bring legislative clarity to an area that has been mired in uncertainty. It also represents a significant shift in the power dynamics between Congress and regulatory bodies like the SEC, emphasizing the role of elected representatives in shaping the regulatory landscape.

As the digital asset industry continues to evolve, the interplay between legislative bodies and regulatory agencies will be crucial in shaping its future. Emmer’s amendment signals a legislative intent to take a more active role in this domain, potentially leading to more comprehensive and well-defined laws governing digital assets.

CBDC Surveillance Concerns Spark Legislative Action

The Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) Anti-Surveillance State Act, which was introduced by Congressman Tom Emmer, symbolizes an increasing level of worry within the political landscape of the United States of America over the possible dangers that may be posed by a digital currency that is issued by the government. The passage of this legislation highlights the need of having a conversation about the future of money in the digital era, as well as the implications of government monitoring and financial privacy.

The CBDC Anti-monitoring State Act, which was reintroduced by Tom Emmer, also known as the Majority Whip, is aimed at addressing the potential for increasing federal monitoring and control that may be enabled by a digital currency that is issued centrally. A central bank digital currency (CBDC) would be a government-issued digital currency that would operate on a digital ledger that is controlled by the government, in contrast to decentralized cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin. This central supervision raises worries about the possibility of carrying out monitoring on transactions and restricting the freedoms that individuals have in their financial lives. The fact that Emmer is going to reintroduce the law in 2023, after having proposed it for the first time in January 2022, highlights the critical nature of these issues in light of the rapidly changing digital financial sector.

The primary purpose of the CBDC Anti-Surveillance State Act is to prohibit the Federal Reserve from issuing a CBDC directly to people. If this were to occur, the Fed would be transformed into a retail bank that would have access to personal financial data. In addition, the law intends to prevent the Federal Reserve from using a CBDC in order to carry out its monetary policy enforcement. The purpose of this initiative is to guarantee that a CBDC issued by the government does not become a tool for government monitoring, similar to the activities that are seen in authoritarian countries, if it is not designed to be open and private in the same way that cash exists. It is clear from the bill’s precise provisions that the government is taking a cautious approach to welcoming developments in digital money while also placing an emphasis on individual privacy and financial liberty.

Although the CBDC Anti-Surveillance State Act was initially supported by fifty co-sponsors, it has since garnered increasing support, with seventy-five members of Congress out of a total of five hundred thirty-five supporting the measure itself. There is a rising awareness and worry among politicians about the possible abuse of digital currencies for monitoring and control, which is highlighted by the increased support these currencies are receiving. The bill has attracted the attention of a variety of political and economic circles, with arguments centered on the difference between a model of digital money that is regulated by the government and an approach that is based on free market principles and protects customer data while encouraging innovation.