disgorgement - Pwim.Net

SEC Seeks $5.3B Judgment Against Terraform Labs and Do Kwon

The United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has initiated legal proceedings against Terraform Labs and its co-founder, Do Kwon, by submitting a demand for the company to pay civil fines and disgorgement in the amount of billions of dollars. The SEC has filed a petition in response to a judgement in a civil matter, and the purpose of the move is to hold Terraform Labs and Kwon responsible for the alleged violations they have committed.

Disgorgement and Civil Penalties: The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has demanded that Terraform Labs and Kwon pay roughly $4.7 billion in disgorgement and prejudgment interest. Disgorgement is the process of repaying earnings that were obtained by dishonest means, while prejudgment interest is a kind of compensation for the time worth of money. Moreover, the Securities and Exchange Commission is requesting a total of $520 million in civil penalties, with Terraform Labs being responsible for $420 million and Kwon being responsible for $100 million.

possible Solutions: Terraform Labs and Kwon have both submitted their briefs in the civil case, in which they propose several possible solutions to the problem. In their proposal, Terraform Labs suggested a maximum civil penalty of $3.5 million, whereas Kwon suggested a penalty of $800,000. The SEC’s proposed sums are much higher than these estimates, which are substantially lower.

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is contemplating the imposition of further measures to deter future breaches, in addition to the disgorgement and civil penalties that have already been imposed. The Securities and Exchange Commission has requested that Kwon be prohibited from acting as an officer or director of a securities company. In addition, the Securities and Exchange Commission is attempting to get a “conduct-based injunction” in order to guarantee that Terraform Labs and Kwon would not commit breaches of a similar kind in the future.

The importance of SEC enforcement is shown by the fact that the SEC has filed a request for disgorgement and civil penalties against Terraform Labs and Do Kwon. This action demonstrates the regulatory agency’s dedication to safeguarding investors and prosecuting those who violate securities laws. By ensuring that both people and businesses are held responsible for their activities, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) strives to preserve the integrity of the financial markets and to encourage fair practices.

Image source: Shutterstock

Ripple on the Brink of Decisive Win as SEC Legal Battle Nears End

In the continuing saga of Ripple versus the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), recent developments suggest a leaning in favor of Ripple, a prominent figure in the cryptocurrency space. Legal experts and community stakeholders are weighing in on the potential outcomes and implications of the case. John Deaton, a leading cryptocurrency attorney, has offered his insight, framing the situation as a significant victory for Ripple, should the case settle for $20 million or less.

Deaton’s comments came in response to general opinions mistaking the case’s conclusion for a balanced verdict between Ripple and the SEC. Instead, Deaton affirms a 90/10 advantage in favor of Ripple, negating the previously held 50/50 assumption. These remarks align with Ripple’s Chief Legal Officer Stuart Alderoty’s note on yet another legal setback for the SEC, referencing the outcome of the SEC vs. Govil case. The Second Circuit Court’s ruling against the SEC’s ability to seek large disgorgement orders without showing actual financial harm to investors strengthens Ripple’s stance. The community has echoed this sentiment, with figures like Wayne Vaughan and Crypto Adviser voicing their perspectives on Twitter, pointing towards a skewed settlement that favors Ripple and criticizing the SEC’s approach to investor protection.

The case, initially launched by the SEC in December 2020, accused Ripple Labs of conducting an unregistered securities offering via XRP sales. This development underscored the growing scrutiny around digital currencies and the SEC’s role in regulating them. The recent approval by Judge Torres of a joint request from the SEC and Ripple to establish a briefing schedule on institutional XRP sales further indicates a progression towards a conclusion. This request, linked to allegations of Rule 10b-5 violations by Ripple, sets a stage for both parties to present a comprehensive briefing schedule by November 9.

As the Ripple vs. SEC case evolves, the implications for the regulatory framework governing digital currencies remain significant. The legal fraternity and crypto community are closely monitoring the unfolding events, with the consensus tilting towards a favorable lean for Ripple. The final resolution of this case could set a precedent for future securities offerings and regulatory actions within the crypto space.

California Court Fines Crowd Machine and Metavine in ICO Case

A California court has recently ruled against Crowd Machine and Metavine, ordering them to pay over $20 million in disgorgement, interest, and penalties. This landmark decision follows the 2018 initial coin offering (ICO) of Crowd Machine Compute Tokens (CMCT), which the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) labeled as fraudulent and unregistered.

The case originated in January 2022 when the SEC filed suit against Crowd Machine’s founder Craig Sproule. Allegations included misuse of $5.8 million from the $33 million raised during the ICO. The CMCT was intended as a digital currency that compensated computer owners for their computing power and paid programmers for writing code. However, these tokens never became operational.

In a recent development, the District Court of Northern California issued an amended final judgment. It ordered the defendants to disgorge $19,676,401.27, pay $3.4 million in prejudgment interest, and imposed civil penalties of $600,000 each. Additionally, Metavine was held liable for disgorgement of $5 million of the total amount. Despite these rulings, the defendants neither admitted nor denied any wrongdoing.

The significance of this case lies in its broader implications for the cryptocurrency industry. ICOs were a popular method for launching cryptocurrencies until the SEC, in July 2017, classified them as securities sales. Since then, the regulatory body has actively pursued cases against ICO issuers for violations.

Crowd Machine and Metavine’s saga serves as a cautionary tale for blockchain startups considering token sales. The hefty fines and legal proceedings highlight the necessity of compliance with securities laws. This case also underscores the SEC’s ongoing efforts to regulate the crypto industry, ensuring investor protection and market integrity.