Facebook Libra: The Latest Crypto Used in Illegal Financial Activities?

“With the evolution of virtual currencies and new marketplaces, nefarious actors are continuously adapting to find new ways to engage in illegal financial activity.” said U.S. Representatives Emanuel Cleaver, during the briefing with Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) on 27 June.

The discussion with FinCEN focused on the use of AI and ML technology to detect illicit financial activity. Cleaver is concerned about Facebook’s Libra project during the briefing. He is doubtful on Facebook’s ability to identify bad actors and thus the ability to prevent financial fraud. He added “We’ve seen the significant damage that foreign adversaries and bad actors have wrought on our democracy through Facebook’s platform, and that was simply through messaging and advertising.”

Cleaver has been very active in encouraging corporations and regulators to prevent the use of cryptocurrencies in illegal activities. For instance, Cleaver sent a letter in July 2018, calling on FinCEN to investigate the case where 12 Russian intelligence officials had been accused of using cryptocurrencies to interfere the 2016 election and request FinCEN to provide further guidance on preventing the financial crimes. In March 2019, Cleaver also sent a letter to FinCEN Director Kenneth Blanco to host a briefing on the working progress of the bureau and steps to be taken.

Congressman Trey Hollingsworth said “I appreciated Director Blanco and his team for sharing the Bureau’s ongoing efforts to use AI/ML to combat money laundering and to collaborate with both financial institutions and technology providers to help strengthen our financial system.”

Thumbnail image credit: Shutterstock

Heads of SEC, CFTC and FinCEN Jointly Warn Crypto Industry to Follow Regulations

The heads of the three major US financial regulators have issued a joint statement warning the cryptocurrency industry to adhere to banking regulations in the development of digital assets. 

The joint statement was signed by Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) Chairman Heath Tarbert, Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) Director Kenneth Blanco and Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Chairman Jay Clayton. The statement reiterates that digital assets must comply with the various banking and financial services laws already in place in the US, regardless of what they call their cryptocurrencies or tokens—citing the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA) which outlines how financial services must be registered in compliance with regulators.

The details of the statement spoke to the nature of digital asset-related activities, explaining that the “activities a person engages in are a key factor in determining whether and how that person must register with the CFTC, FinCEN, or the SEC.” 

The statement further highlights that an ‘exchange’ in a digital assets market may or may not qualify or be categorized as an ‘exchange’ in the federal securities market. Quoted from the joint statement, “Regardless of the label or terminology that market participants may use, or the level or type of technology employed, it is the facts and circumstances underlying an asset, activity or service, including its economic reality and use (whether intended or organically developed or repurposed), that determines the general categorization of an asset, the specific regulatory treatment of the activity involving the asset, and whether the persons involved are ‘financial institutions’ for purposes of the BSA.”

Comments from the SEC

In additional comments, Chairman Jay Clayton, Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) spoke on the responsibilities of his department stating that “The statutory mission of the SEC is to protect investors, maintain fair, orderly, and efficient markets, and facilitate capital formation. In general, the SEC has jurisdiction over securities and securities-related conduct. Persons engaged in activities involving digital assets that are securities have registration or other statutory or regulatory obligations under the federal securities laws.” Clayton concluded, “Broker-dealers and mutual funds are required to implement reasonably-designed AML Programs and report suspicious activity  These rules are not limited in their application to activities involving digital assets that are “securities” under the federal securities laws.”

Image via Shutterstock

Director of FinCEN Affirms That Cryptocurrency Industry Is in Line With Agency Regulations

The director of FinCEN (Financial Crimes Enforcement Network) Kenneth. A Blanco believes that the cryptocurrency industry is starting to fall in place with the agency’s regulations on money transmission services. A speech was given at the American Bankers Association & American Bar Association Financial Crimes Enforcement Conference suggested that FinCEN’s guidance of May 2019 showed more positive impacts of the crypto – space.

The report also verified how the regulations related to the money services business, also known as MSB’s, apply to the specific business models within the industry as well as abiding by obligations under the United States Bank Secrecy Act.

Kenneth also observed that businesses within the crypto space are increasing their internalization of the agency’s essential advisory and applying them in their filings directly.

Image via Shutterstock 

FinCEN Warns Social Media Companies Involved in Crypto to be Vigilant Regarding Illicit Transactions

The Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) has urged social media and messaging companies that are working with on cryptocurrencies to be vigilant about illegal transactions. 
 
Jamal El-Hindi, the Deputy Director of the FinCEN spoke at the SIFMA twentieth Anti-Money Laundering (AML) and Financial Crimes Conference in New York. Along with the agency’s publication, these social media companies have been warned that they “cannot turn a blind eye to illicit transactions that they might be fostering,” focusing on the establishment of cryptocurrencies.  
 
He suggested that information sharing and know-your-customer (KYC) processes may be discouraged because of the nature of the industry, which is highly competitive. Only 14% of all entities in the securities sector are eligible to register for one of the key information-sharing mechanisms, choose to share the information.  
 
He added, “Social media and messaging platforms and others now focusing on the establishment of cryptocurrencies cannot turn a blind eye to illicit transactions that they may be fostering.” 
 
El-Hindi also warned of the responsibility of the traditional financial sector, “To the extent that the financial sector chooses to move forward with […] these emerging systems […] we are not going to allow it to slide backward on the protections and appropriate transparency that we have collectively worked so hard to weave into the financial system.” 
 
The heads of the three major US financial regulators have issued a joint statement warning the cryptocurrency industry to adhere to banking regulations in the development of digital assets. The joint statement was signed by Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) Chairman Heath Tarbert, Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) Director Kenneth Blanco and Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Chairman Jay Clayton. The statement reiterates that digital assets must comply with the various banking and financial services laws already in place in the US. In October 2019, Kenneth Blanco, the Director of the FinCEN warned crypto firms that they are not exempted from AML laws as well.   

Image via Shutterstock

Crypto & the FATF Travel Rule: FinCEN Suggests Challenges in Governance, Not Technology

The Financial Action Task Force (FATF) Travel Rule has been in the center of attention lately, which concerns crypto transactions above a certain amount must be accompanied by identifying information. 

The rule is an update to the existing FATF Recommendation 16, regarding cross-border and domestic wire transfers, and is intended to address the anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorist financing (CFT) challenges as crypto adoption increases. The FATF Travel Rule could mean implications for virtual asset service providers (VASPs), including cryptocurrency exchanges, wallet providers, and custodians. 

Financial institutions in the FATF member states are recommended to implement the new regulations by June 2020, a year after it was adopted by the FATF in June 2019. 

The FATF has started observing digital assets in 2014, and defining certain terms has always been a challenge for the task force. As Amy Davine Kim, the Chief Policy Officer at the Chamber of Digital Commerce explained at Consensus: Distributed explained, there are still ongoing concerns regarding cybersecurity and privacy concerns over the travel rule.

Since the COVID-19 pandemic emerged, the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) has published advisories on March 16 and April 3, to warn financial institutions to stay alert for malicious fraudulent transactions, and AML operations during the COVID-19 pandemic. This was due to the increase in these types of cases, as bad actors have leveraged the pandemic for theft and money laundering activities. 

The FinCEN has taken a technology-neutral approach so far, as the network has seen the most challenges relating to governance and processes, rather than technology.

Kenneth Blanco, Director of the FinCEN stated, “the FinCEN also plans to publish multiple advisories highlighting common typologies used in pervasive fraud, theft, and money laundering activities related to the pandemic to better help the financial sector to better protect, and report this activity.”

Blanco also added that the FinCEN has observed that cybercriminals predominantly launder their proceeds and purchase the tools to conduct malicious activities via virtual currency. He said, “During this time of crisis where our people are more at risk or more vulnerable than ever, we, all of us, have a duty and responsibility to use our abilities, tools, and talents to protect others and ensure the stability of this ecosystem that we are creating and it depends on trust.”

Blanco concluded,

“We encourage the virtual currency sector to continue collaborative efforts to develop and implement these solutions and to keep FinCEN apprised their progress, including to participate in FinCEN’s innovation hours program.”

Coinbase recently revealed that the company has become a banking client of JP Morgan’s, impacting the future outlook of cryptocurrency exchanges and banking relationships.

Regarding the news, Jeff Horowitz, the Chief Compliance Officer at Coinbase said the company is focusing on analytics and transaction monitoring systems as banks will want to see these features in the crypto ecosystem. While he is pleased to see JP Morgan and other banks getting into the space, he said he hopes to see solutions for lower barriers to entry, as well as the solutions to comply with the travel rule do not come from a money-making perspective. 

He further suggested that a “regulated” VASP has not been defined globally, and the industry must work to decide a framework regionally, then work on going global.

Adam White, Chief Operating Officer at Bakkt said, “We’re going to see a bifurcation in the crypto space, we’re going to see white crypto, and we’re going to see grey crypto, and the different forms of crypto will most likely trade for different prices. Offshore unregulated exchanges that aren’t complying with the travel rule, their assets will be traded at different prices.”

Leaked FinCEN Files: $137M Linked to Crypto Ponzi Scam OneCoin Laundered Through Bank of New York Mellon

A leaked trove of US official documents revealed that five major banks – Deutsche Bank, HSBC, JP Morgan, Bank of New York Mellon, and Standard Chartered Bank – were involved in illicit transactions pertaining to mobsters, crypto Ponzi schemes, and money laundering.

The official Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) document was leaked and disclosed that more than two trillion USD had been laundered and flagged as suspicious by financial institutions following the Anti-Money Laundering (AML) act. However, the dirty money was still reported to have been freely flowing through renowned US banking institutions.

BNY Mellon wired millions linked to OneCoin

Among them, one of America’s oldest banks, the Bank of New York Mellon (BNY Mellon) was reported to have wired funds linked to the infamous crypto laundering Ponzi scheme OneCoin.

The banking institution flagged a series of transactions from their branch to FinCEN, as the transactions were deemed suspicious and layered. Layering refers to a money laundering ruse through which the source of funds is concealed through multiple transactions. It is often used by mobsters and criminals to remain undetected by the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network and other financial regulators.

$137 million in transactions wired through BNY Mellon

The funds pinpointed by BNY Mellon were linked to OneCoin, a crypto scam that made the headlines and was classified as a Ponzi scheme generating multimillion funds by US law enforcement agents. The crypto Ponzi scheme was masterminded by Ruja Ignatova, who disappeared to flee arrest.

OneCoin was operational in many countries, such as New Zealand and the US, to name a few, and generated at least $4 billion through cryptocurrency “pyramid schemes,” making it one of the most successful and biggest Ponzi scheme in cryptocurrency history.

According to the leaked report, a combined $137 million was wired thanks to numerous transactions operating through the Bank of New York Mellon. The source of the transactions was reported by the bank to originate from OneCoin perpetrators and agents.

Other banks that were named in the leaked FinCen files include Deutsche Bank, JP Morgan, Standard Chartered Bank, and HSBC.

Deutsche Bank

The Deutsche Bank is alleged to have played a role in moving money worth more than $560 million for a Latin American construction company. It is alleged by US prosecutors to have been subject to foreign bribery. FinCEN has recorded a combined total of $1.3 trillion of suspicious transactions flowing through Deutsche Bank, making it the lead bank of the pack for having the largest suspicious transaction volume.

JP Morgan

JP Morgan was said to have processed at least $514 billion of suspicious transactions. It was said to have been involved in a money-laundering operation involving former Trump campaign manager Paul Manafort, and Bernie Madoff. It is also alleged to have conducted business with a financial Malaysian fugitive and a Venezuelan criminal.

Standard Chartered Bank and HSBC

Standard Chartered Bank was said to have processed illicit transactions amounting to a combined $24 million for foreign mobsters.

Finally, HSBC is alleged to have been in cahoots with Russian mobsters, moving funds amounting to at least $4.5 billion in suspicious transactions. The bank is alleged to have continued its money laundering transactions and to have wired funds linked to a Ponzi Scheme. An HSBC Hong Kong executive has been accused of processing more than $900 million in transactions linked to criminal networks.

Statements from Deutsche Bank and other financial banks have said that the incidents that have come to light in the documents have already been investigated and resolved with Deutsche Bank’s complete cooperation.

FinCEN Director Kenneth Blanco Warns Banks to Take Crypto AML Seriously

Kenneth Blanco, the Director of the US Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) warned banks to seriously consider how virtual currencies should fit into their anti-money laundering (AML) policies.

FinCEN Director Kenneth Blanco discussed the banks’ obligation to implement effective AML policies and warned them to consider the risks associated with cryptocurrency—at the virtual 2020 ACAMs anti-money laundering conference in Las Vegas.

Blanco said:

“To be clear, exchanges are not the only ones with crypto risk exposure. These risks are not unique to money services businesses or virtual currency exchanges; banks must be thinking about their crypto exposure as well.”

According to current FinCEN regulations—under regulation FIN-2019-A003—it is the responsibility of banks to identify and report suspicious financial activity pertaining to bad actors exploiting “convertible virtual currencies (CVCs) for money laundering, sanctions evasion, and other illicit financing purposes, particularly involving darknet marketplaces, peer-to-peer (P2P) exchangers, foreign-located Money Service Businesses (MSBs), and CVC kiosks.”

For most banks, it appears they are still unclear on the risk exposure of virtual currencies and how they could affect their financial institution.

During the webinar, Director Blanco put emphasis on the need for banks to proactively assess and their current AML policies in relation to cryptocurrency and warned that if they do not take this into consideration “it will be apparent” when they are examined.

Blanco warned:

“These are areas your examiners, and FinCEN, will ask you about when assessing the effectiveness of your AML program.”

Typically P2P exchanges have little to no AML or know-your-customer (KYC) policies in effect which could result in money laundering risks for banks and other financial institutes that choose to accept transactions from these platforms.Major Banks Under Fire For Relaxed AML and KYC ComplianceEver since Bitcoin’s inception, its reputation has been marred by its association to the Silk Road darkweb marketplace—where one could buy anything from weapons to drugs leveraging the cryptocurrency.

However, last week it was the major banking institutions that came under fire—after a leaked trove of US official, FinCen documents revealed that five major banks—Deutsche Bank, HSBC, JP Morgan, Bank of New York Mellon, and Standard Chartered Bank—were involved in illicit transactions pertaining to mobsters, crypto Ponzi schemes, and money laundering.

The official document disclosed that more than two trillion USD had been laundered and flagged as suspicious by financial institutions following the Anti-Money Laundering (AML) act. However, the dirty money was still reported to have been freely flowing through renowned global banking institutions.

First Bitcoin Mixer Slapped with $60M Fine by FinCEN in Money Laundering Crackdown

The Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) has charged a Bitcoin-mixing operator with a $60 million civil money penalty for violating anti-money laundering regulations.

Bitcoin shuffling gone wrong

Larry Dean Harmon was arrested and charged with providing unregistered money services businesses from 2014 to 2020. Operating under Helix and Coin Ninja, he contributed as a founder and primary operator. Both platforms provided Bitcoin trading services and virtual currency mixers. Currently, in addition to being fined a $60 million penalty, Harmon also faces charges of conspiracy for money laundering and operating “an unlicensed money transmitting business.”

According to FinCEN’s announcement, Harmon laundered over $300 million in Bitcoin (BTC) and enabled the trafficking of drugs, guns, and child pornography by promoting Helix’s services as a Bitcoin mixer through the dark web. US law officials also stipulated that over 365,000 Bitcoin transactions were processed through Helix.

In addition to promoting Helix services through his role as a primary cryptocurrency exchanger, Harmon also acted as a CEO for Coin Ninja, which was alleged to have offered unregistered money service businesses. Per the report:

“FinCEN’s investigation revealed that Mr. Harmon willfully violated the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA)’s registration, program, and reporting requirements by failing to register as a Money Services Businesses (MSB), failing to implement and maintain an effective anti-money laundering program, and failing to report suspicious activities.”

Per the charges from FinCEN, Harmon deliberately and knowingly went against the regulatory framework of the Bank Secrecy Act, conducting businesses with drug traffickers and counterfeiters by converting and exchanging Bitcoin through different techniques. FinCEN also alleges that the Bitcoin-mixing operator hid the illicit activities by actively deleting customer information he collected through Helix.

What is a Bitcoin mixer?

Bitcoin mixing is typically a solution that is used to minimize the risks of transacting with BTC online, through a “virtual currency shuffling” system. It offers services that aim to provide sender anonymity and privacy by swapping one’s BTC with others’ BTC. Privacy provided by Bitcoin mixing algorithms enables BTC investors to transact safely on the web, undetected by criminals looking to steal their crypto funds.

Unfortunately, though Bitcoin mixing can provide online security to investors and virtual currency holders, it has also been leveraged by criminals in certain instances to further their illicit activities in an anonymous way. 

French Finance Minister Praises Blockchain, but Condemns Cryptocurrency

French Finance Minister Bruno Le Maire has once again made his stance on crypto clear – he is critical of it and does not support it.

Le Maire backs blockchain, hates crypto

Though Le Maire has time and again reiterated that he disliked cryptocurrencies, associating them with illicit activities such as drug trafficking, the purchase of weapons, money laundering, and more, he has hinted that he did not put blockchain in the same basket. Rather, he surprised the crypto community by implying his support for blockchain, the underlying infrastructure for all things Bitcoin and digital assets.

Le Maire appeared to back blockchain, as indicated from a Twitter response he wrote addressing crypto fund partner of Starchain Capital, Cyril Paglino. The seasoned crypto bull tagged the French Finance Minister in his post and said:

“This 10-year-old myth about cryptocurrencies needs to stop spreading. Transactions on a blockchain are secure and traceable. It is of no interest to a terrorist. Unlike cash, which circulates without any control.”

Paglino referred to the recent Financial Crime Enforcement Network (FinCEN) leak, where more than two trillion USD was alleged to have been laundered through five major banks. Despite being flagged, the dirty money was reported to have still been flowing through institutional banks.

Le Maire then answered that the French Finance Ministry and he “did not question the reliability and traceability of blockchain technologies.” However, he remained firm on his stance regarding cryptocurrencies, stressing that the nuanced stance he adopted was that “certain crypto assets could have been used to facilitate fraudulent transactions (drugs, arms, money laundering) in an anonymous manner.”

Le Maire condemns Facebook’s Libra token

Le Maire had previously vocalized his views on Facebook’s Libra token, denouncing it as an asset prone to be leveraged for money laundering and terrorism financing. He had said that the Facebook-backed token would risk the “monetary sovereignty of states.” He said:

“All these concerns around Libra are serious. So I want to say this with a lot of clarity, I want to be absolutely clear: in these conditions, we cannot authorize the development of Libra on European soil.”

Circle CEO: Treasury’s Crypto Wallet Rule is a Potential Next Level of Financial Surveillance Never Seen Before

The US Treasury Department recently proposed a new regulation, which requires banks and money service businesses such as crypto trading platforms to verify the identities of self-hosted or unhosted wallet holders for any digital asset transaction that exceed $3,000. 

In an effort to address anonymous transfers of digital assets by “bad actors,” the US Treasury Department has launched a proposal to require some crypto users to offer information about their identities. The new plan targets private accounts that allow the holder of a unique digital key to store crypto assets and transact with others directly without going through a financial institution.

Any cryptocurrency transaction that exceeds $10,000 would need to be reported to the Financial Crime Enforcement Network (FinCEN) within 15 days, according to the proposed regulation.

Jeremy Allaire expressed concerns ahead of the proposal

Jeremy Allaire, the CEO of payments company Circle has previously sent a letter to the Treasury Department, calling for an improved regulation that could offer a “meaningful safe harbor” for players within the cryptocurrency ecosystem. Allaire was inspired by word getting out of the enactment of a regulatory ban over self-hosted crypto wallets prior to the proposal. 

Allaire has had the opinion that the cryptocurrency industry has been working very hard to prevent the technology from being harnessed by bad actors, which is one of the biggest fears of the Treasury Department. Allaire further advocated that the Treasury Department should give industry players about a year or two to implement technologies that can ensure proper KYC policies and other transaction reporting requirements, to not hinder innovations in the blockchain industry. 

Jeremy Allaire: Rule on unhosted wallets is a personal mission for Secretary Mnuchin

According to Allaire, the proposed regulation by the Treasury Department on unhosted wallets was a personal mission for Secretary Mnuchin. The Circle CEO explained that Mnuchin’s personal view is far more aggressive than the proposed rule that was put forward. Allaire further explained:

“His original plan was to just drop this as a final rule with zero notice for public comment, as a “midnight rulemaking” on his way out of office. This actually didn’t have broad support, in fact very few people were even aware of this plan. As people got word, an intense amount of work went on behind the scenes to try to at least get this for a standard notice and public review.”

Mnuchin’s excuse for not wanting a public review was due to the fact that he believed this would allow the “bad guys” to move their funds off of regulated exchanges, however, as Allaire pointed out, the reason could be the fact that Jan. 20 is the end of his term.

15 days given to stakeholders is not enough

The Treasury has given stakeholders 15 days to respond with comments for the proposed rules. Allaire commented on the short period:

“The biggest issue here is first and foremost that 15 days over the holidays is totally inadequate and is just frankly a cynical ploy to jam this through no matter what feedback comes back.  This violates the APA, so if it’s jammed through, expect a lawsuit for an injunction.”

New rule proposes a new level of financial surveillance

According to Allaire, the proposed rule introduces the “potential for a level of financial surveillance that goes beyond anything that exists with the existing banking system.” Allaire argued that while a large cash transaction can involve a CTR filing, however, regulators cannot track where the cash goes. 

The Circle CEO advocated again for more time to work as an industry with the regulators, to prevent the hindering of creating new breakthrough innovations. He concluded:

“Key thing now is to apply as much pressure as possible, and litigate if necessary, to ensure the kind of public review, comment and iteration that this critical new economic infrastructure and innovation deserves.”

Exit mobile version