Blockchain and the Wheel of Fate: The Role of Blockchain Technology in Disease Surveillance and Pandemic Prevention

There is a line in Stephen King’s The Stand that goes: ‘Life was such a wheel that no man could stand upon it for long. And it always, in the end, came round to the same place again.’

In The Stand, a man-made virus wipes out most of the world population within a short timespan. The antigen is a genetically modified flu-virus designed to be a constantly shifting agent, thus rendering it extremely or totally invulnerable to vaccines. The virus was part of a larger US Government-funded bio-weapons program known as Project Blue. 

Project Blue’s end game is a global Superflu epidemic, nicknamed Captain Trips. The Superflu rapidly spreads worldwide, thinning out the human race to barely a thread of existence. 

The Stand is a work of fiction, of course. The story deals with how the survivors (0.6% of the entire human population are naturally immune) deal with the new world, ultimately boiling down to a final stand between good and evil. 

But the book’s core message of a flu-like disease rapidly spreading and infecting an ever-increasing number of people across the world is very real and relevant indeed. 

It’s happening right now.

Coronavirus outbreak: The wheel has come to the same place again

At the time of writing, the coronavirus outbreak has killed almost 3,000 people worldwide, with more than 80,000 infections confirmed and rising, as the virus pops up in new countries. 

Pandemics, defined as international cross-border epidemics that infect and kill large percentages of the population have occurred through the ages. The deadliest perhaps are The Black Death in mid-14th-century that killed between 75 and 200 million people (true figure will never be known), and the 1918 Spanish Flu, which may have killed up to 100m people.

Global epidemics can occur anytime, anywhere, as we have seen with the ongoing coronavirus outbreak. The first case was detected in Wuhan, China, on December 31, 2019. Wuhan, a city of around 11 million people, became a hotbed for coronavirus infection. The disease spread like wildfire and soon reached other Chinese cities before crossing international borders. 

Modern air travel means that an infected individual can reach almost anywhere in the world within a few hours, which makes containment almost impossible, and global contagion a real possibility. 

So what can be done to prevent that wheel from coming back again to the same place as it did in the mid 14th century and 1918?

Using blockchain technology as a weapon to prevent pandemics

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) is the United States’ chief public health and disease prevention agency. CDC operatives show up wherever and whenever an outbreak of an infectious disease is detected. The CDC is researching how blockchain technology can become the latest weapon in their armamentarium to fight disease and prevent future epidemics from razing the world.

But this vital fight can sometimes be hampered by difficulties in the timely sharing of information with local health enforcement agencies on the ground. Language barriers, the sheer distance between the geographical location of an outbreak, cultural differences, and many other factors might become an issue that slows the transmission and exchange of information, which in some cases might literally become a life or death situation. Time is of the essence when dealing with outbreaks of the deadly disease.

Currently, the CDC uploads epidemiological data to a cloud-based solution, which is far from ideal as personally identifiable information cannot be stored there, due to data privacy and security risks, forcing on-the-ground operatives to find alternative solutions, which means more precious time-wasting. A blockchain-powered solution would address this issue, as data can be shared instantly while complying with data privacy and security regulations. 

But the CDC’s intended use of blockchain technology is only one of myriad other revolutionary use cases in healthcare.

We have seen that disease outbreaks can happen at any time, anywhere on the planet, with little or no warning. Blockchain will not prevent the outbreak itself, nothing can. These are natural events that have occurred in the past and will re-occur in the future. That wheel spins all the time, remember.

But what blockchain can do is create the first line of rapid defense through a network of connected devices whose only purpose is to remain vigilant about disease outbreaks, 24/7, 365 days a year, in perpetuity. Blockchain is a highly scalable solution that works in real-time, implementing machine learning and artificial intelligence routines that can gather, analyze, and collate data and instantly recommend a course of action, should an outbreak be detected. This instant response capability can represent the difference between quick containment and global contagion. 

Coronavirus Tracking and Surveillance May Have Consequences for the Protection of Personal Data Privacy

The World Health Organization (WHO) has recently stated that the coronavirus pandemic is “accelerating,” as 20% of the world’s population goes into lockdown in an attempt to curb the spread of the virus. People are told to stay at home as the world is entering a critical week, with over 381,761 cases confirmed around the world at the time of reporting.

According to statistics, the first 100,000 of confirmed cases took 67 days to appear, the next 100,000 in 11 days, and the next 100,000 in just four days. We are quickly approaching the next 100,000. 

However, Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, WHO Director-General said that there was still hope and that it was still possible to “change the trajectory.” He advised countries to continue and adopt rigorous testing as well as contact-tracing strategies.  

South Korea

South Korea has been coming up with innovative solutions during its fight against Covid-19, including a “self-health check” app to keep tabs on foreign visitors. The app has been used more than 60,000 times, and the usage rate has recorded over 90 percent. 

The government agencies have also been using surveillance-camera footage, smartphone location data and credit card purchase history to trace the movements of the confirmed coronavirus victims to track transmission chains. The government also posted detailed location histories of each coronavirus patient including their whereabouts before they tested positive. This information included when and where the patients went for work, their favorite massage parlors, and karaoke bars. Netizens were able to identify patients by name by using the detailed information released by the government. 

However, the Director of South Korea’s Centers for Disease Control and Prevention stated that the country will “balance the value of protecting individual human rights and privacy and the value of upholding public interest in preventing mass infections.” This decision was made as there were concerns that the privacy invasions might have discouraged South Korean citizens to come forward and get tested for the virus. 

China’s Alipay and WeChat Pay

Alipay and WeChat Pay, the country’s most used mobile payment systems, have been suggested to provide the information collected from the citizens. The Alipay ewallet, owned by Alibaba Holdings, and WeChat, owned by Tencent, has close ties to the Chinese government. Mobile payments in China reached over $41 trillion annually, with over 92 percent of mobile payments made via Alipay and WeChat Pay. 

China has been progressing with the development of its central bank digital currency (CBDC), its digital currency electronic payment (DCEP). It has been revealed that the digital payment system is to replace M0 supply, which are the notes and coins in circulation, and is aimed at the retail market.  

Mu Changchun, the Director-General of the Institute of Digital Currency of the People’s Bank of China previously made a comment that the DCEP would “provide redundancy” to China’s “advanced electronic payment platforms” including payment duopoly WeChat Pay and Alipay.  

What is blockchain’s role in ensuring personal privacy?

Brittany Kaiser, the Cambridge Analytica scandal whistleblower, discussed in an interview at the World Economic Forum that blockchain technology could be an essential tool to address data protection issues.  

The Cambridge Analytica scandal broke out in 2016 when it revealed that the data of over 87 million Facebook users have been reaped through a personality quiz. Cambridge Analytica was involved in US President Donald Trump’s election campaign.

Kaiser is now serving as the co-founder of Own Your Data Foundation, a digital intelligence startup. In her interview, she said, “In my opinion, it’s really blockchain tech and blockchain entrepreneurs that are going to solve a lot of problems of the data protection crisis.” Kaiser believes that personal data is one of the most valuable assets in the world, and blockchain can help people to protect their personal data.

Blockchain technology could potentially enable the protection of personal privacy, while personal information could still be released when needed. Blockchain can track and store personal data, and with its immutable nature, the stored information would remain safe and secure. 

Although the immutable feature of blockchain may also have its complications, as the user will not have the option to erase parts of their personal information once it has been stored on the blockchain, which defies the European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation, which ensures all users to have the right to be forgotten.

Image via Shutterstock

LocalBitcoins Deploys Elliptic’s Blockchain-Powered Tracking Tools for Enhanced Surveillance

Leading peer to peer (P2P) Bitcoin trading platform LocalBitcoins has partnered with Elliptic, a global provider of crypto asset risk management solutions, to tame the headache of its illegal usage through blockchain-enabled monitoring tools.

Elliptic has had a reputation for offering crypto compliance solutions to enterprise crypto-financial institutions and businesses. 

Screening crypto transactions

Through the strategic collaboration, Finland-based LocalBitcoins will comply with regulations, such as know-your-customer (KYC) and the European Union’s Fifth Money Laundering Directive (5AMLD). The P2P platform will use Elliptic Lens and Elliptic Navigator to screen crypto wallets and transactions, respectively. 

According to a recent analysis by cryptocurrency intelligence company CipherTrace, LocalBitcoins has been a popular marketplace of receiving illegal funds. It, therefore, seeks to remove this reputation by deploying the blockchain monitoring tools.

Suspicious transactions continue wreaking havoc in the crypto space. Nevertheless, blockchain-based solutions are being touted as game-changers. For instance, CipherTrace has unveiled a predictive risk-scoring model to flag down money laundering of cryptocurrencies. 

Anti-money laundering controls

According to Elliptic’s co-founder and chief scientist, Tom Robinson, P2P platforms in the crypto space have not been left behind. They are making notable strides in adopting new regulatory measures by initiating more technology-enabled and stringent anti-money laundering controls. 

He added, “By choosing Elliptic, LocalBitcoins have demonstrated their commitment to eliminating illicit use of their platform.”

On the part of LocalBitcoins CEO, Sebastian Sonntag, he acknowledged, “Elliptic will enable us to achieve the highest levels of compliance while increasing operational efficiency and reducing costs. We will continue to invest heavily in AML and KYC to maintain a secure and trusted platform for our valued customers.”

Chainalysis Launches Program to Help Law Enforcement with Monitoring and Storing Seized Crypto Assets

Blockchain surveillance company Chainalysis has launched an asset realization program intended to assist law enforcement and government agencies with monitoring, realizing, and storing seized crypto assets. This service aims to help crack down unlawful crypto usage worldwide.

Offering crypto investigative assistance

The unveiling of this program comes in the wake of the biggest seizure of Bitcoin worth $1 billion by the United States Department of Justice (DoJ), originating from an unnamed hacker earlier this month. 

Chainalysis played a pivotal role in this capture because it provided blockchain analytical tools, which enabled law enforcers to scrutinize and pinpoint crypto wallets used to aid the sale of narcotics on Silk Road, a leading darknet marketplace before it was shut down by law enforcement. 

The blockchain company will partner with Asset Reality in its mission to launch an asset realization program, because the latter has expertise in the sale of seized funds, given that it realizes and manages confiscated assets for global clients.  

Building trust in crypto assets

Jason Bonds, the chief revenue officer at Chainalysis, acknowledged that cryptocurrencies are increasingly becoming mainstream, resulting in both good and bad actors being attracted by digital assets. He said:

“Chainalysis is dedicated to building trust in digital assets, and that means helping to detect and investigate illicit activity. As our government partners become more successful in rooting out bad actors, assisting them with asset recovery and realization is a natural next step.”

Chainalysis has shown its devotion to revamp the crypto space by eradicating illegal activities. For instance, in September, it joined hands with the Wyoming Division of Banking to fight cybercrime and illicit activities pertaining to crypto laundering, crypto scams, sanctions violations, and more.

The analytics company has also been helping the crypto industry grow with the data accumulated during their analysis of blockchain activity. In August, it disclosed that cryptocurrency assets valued at nearly $50 billion left China in 2019. The exit of wealth via crypto showed the likelihood of investors evading capital transfer restrictions in China.

Lithuania Government Cashes in Seized Crypto Worth €6.4 Million

Through the State Tax Inspectorate (STI), the Lithuania government has cashed in €6.4 million worth of seized cryptocurrency, approximately $7.6 million, and slotted the profits straight into the state budget. This marked the first time confiscated crypto was being sold on Lithuanian soil, and the process was lengthy taking nearly a day.

Seized cryptocurrencies on the rise

Irina Gavrilova, a State Tax Inspectorate representative, acknowledged:

“The whole process for the tax administrator was new, starting with the taking over of the confiscated cryptocurrency and ending with its implementation.”

This revelation comes in the wake of the biggest seizure of Bitcoin worth $1 billion by the United States Department of Justice (DoJ), originating from an unnamed hacker earlier this month. This capture took place with the help of blockchain analysis because law enforcers were able to scrutinize and pinpoint crypto wallets used to aid the sale of narcotics on Silk Road, a leading darknet marketplace before it was shut down by law enforcement.

It, therefore, shows that global governments are working round the clock to track and capture crypto used in illegal activities. This quest was recently boosted after blockchain surveillance company Chainalysis launched an asset realization program to assist law enforcement and government agencies with monitoring, realizing, and storing seized crypto assets.

Privacy coins on the spotlight

The STI affirmed that the confiscated cryptocurrencies were seized in February. They comprised Ethereum(ETH), Monero(XMR), and Bitcoin(BTC).

Privacy-oriented cryptos or privacy coins like Monero have been in the limelight because they are designed in such a way that they protect the identity of the user transacting.

This is one of the reasons why South Korea’s Financial Services Commission (FSC) recently announced that it would ban privacy-centric digital assets or “dark coins” from crypto exchanges as they presented a high money laundering and illegal activity risk.

Bitcoin-like Wisdom: Edward Snowden's Call for Algorithms to Replace Institutions

Edward Snowden, the well-known whistleblower, has recently brought to light concerns regarding the impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on surveillance and public trust in institutions. In a world increasingly reliant on technology, Snowden’s cautionary words resonate with both experts and the public alike.

Erosion of Public Trust and AI’s Disruptive Potential

Snowden’s warning comes against the backdrop of declining public faith in traditional institutions. He emphasizes the need for AI models to not just mimic human capabilities but surpass them. This advancement in AI is seen as a potential countermeasure against invasive surveillance tactics, which Snowden famously exposed in 2013. The former defense contractor argues that as institutions continue to erode public trust, AI could play a pivotal role in shaping a new era where algorithms replace traditional establishments.

The Debate on AI’s Future

Snowden’s views are part of a larger debate on AI’s role in our society. Figures like Elon Musk and Eric Schmidt have expressed concerns about the existential risks posed by unchecked AI development. On the other hand, Bill Gates argues against halting AI progress, emphasizing the need for continuous development despite the challenges.

Security and Privacy Risks of Rapid AI Deployment

Adding to the complexity of this debate, the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has warned about the security and privacy risks associated with the rapid deployment of AI systems. Risks include adversarial manipulation of training data, model vulnerabilities, and privacy breaches. These concerns highlight the need for robust mitigation measures to counter potential threats.

Implications and Future Directions

Snowden’s warning is a call for introspection on the future of AI amid dwindling public trust in institutions. It raises crucial questions about the role of AI in countering surveillance and the ethical implications of its rapid development. As technology continues to advance, it becomes increasingly important for society to navigate these challenges responsibly, balancing innovation with privacy and security concerns.

Parallel Visions: AI’s Role in Governance and Bitcoin’s Financial Revolution

The visionary perspectives of Edward Snowden on AI and the foundational principles of Bitcoin both converge on a common theme: the shift towards decentralization and the replacement of traditional institutions. Snowden’s insights on AI focus on its potential to transcend human capabilities in governance, thereby countering the erosion of public trust in conventional institutions. He envisions a future where algorithms, not humans, could be at the forefront of decision-making processes, addressing issues of bias, inefficiency, and privacy concerns. This mirrors the ethos behind Bitcoin, a revolutionary digital currency that operates on a Proof of Work (PoW) based, trustless network. Bitcoin challenges the traditional financial system by eliminating the need for central banks and intermediaries.

As Bitcoin’s founder Satoshi Nakamoto articulated in 2009, ‘I’ve been working on a new electronic cash system that’s fully peer-to-peer, with no trusted third party. This system is completely decentralized, with no central server or trusted parties, because it is based on cryptographic proof instead of trust.
Both AI, as Snowden sees it, and Bitcoin represent a paradigm shift: one where reliance on centralized entities is reduced, and trust is either entrusted to unbiased algorithms or distributed across a transparent, secure network. While Snowden’s vision encompasses a broader societal and governance scope, and Bitcoin specifically targets the financial sector, the core principle of decentralization remains a pivotal point of conver
In conclusion, Snowden’s remarks underscore the need for a careful approach to AI development, considering its potential both as a tool for enhancing privacy and as a source of new risks. This debate is not just about technology but about the future of society and governance in the age of AI.

Misuse of Facial Recognition: The $10M Macy's and Sunglass Hut Legal Battle

The recent lawsuit filed by Harvey Eugene Murphy Jr. against Macy’s and Sunglass Hut underscores the escalating concerns over the misuse of facial recognition technology in the retail sector. The case, which involves a $10 million claim, highlights the significant risks and ethical dilemmas posed by artificial intelligence (AI) tools in identifying individuals for law enforcement purposes.

In January 2022, a robbery occurred at a Houston Sunglass Hut store. The facial recognition system used by the retailers misidentified Murphy as the armed robber. The lawsuit alleges that this error was primarily due to the low quality of the surveillance footage and the inherent flaws in the facial recognition software. It’s noteworthy that Murphy claims he was in California at the time of the robbery, which he says his counsel verified.

This misidentification had dire consequences for Murphy. After his wrongful arrest, he was detained in an overcrowded maximum-security jail with violent offenders. During his imprisonment, Murphy reportedly suffered a brutal assault, including being beaten and sexually assaulted, leading to significant physical and psychological trauma.

The lawsuit raises serious questions about the reliability and discriminatory potential of facial recognition technology. Murphy’s legal team has pointed out the technology’s propensity for error, especially in cases involving people of color and older individuals. These concerns echo broader debates in the tech community and among civil rights advocates about the ethical use of AI in surveillance and law enforcement.

A Macy’s spokesperson declined to comment on the pending litigation, and the Houston Police Department and Harris County have not been named in the lawsuit. However, this case aligns with a growing number of legal actions against the misuse of facial recognition technology. For instance, in December 2023, the Federal Trade Commission banned RiteAid from using facial recognition for five years, citing the technology’s higher likelihood of generating false positives in stores located in predominantly Black and Asian communities.

Murphy, who had past run-ins with the law but had since reformed, now faces ongoing challenges from the physical and psychological impacts of the assault he endured. The lawsuit filed by Murphy seeks not only compensation but also to act as a catalyst for change, highlighting the need for more stringent regulations and ethical considerations in the deployment of facial recognition technologies.

EU Court Upholds Privacy in Encrypted Messaging Ruling

The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) has set a precedent that strengthens the privacy rights of individuals across Europe, signaling a robust defense of freedom of expression and the right to private communication. The court’s decision came in response to the case involving demands for creating backdoors into encrypted messaging services such as Telegram and Signal, a move that was argued to be necessary for national security and law enforcement purposes.

The ruling underscores the tension between privacy rights and government surveillance efforts, highlighting the European Convention on Human Rights as a bulwark against excessive state intrusion. By refusing the imposition of backdoors, the ECHR recognized the inherent risks such measures pose not only to individual privacy but also to the broader principles of democracy and the rule of law as enshrined in the Convention.

This decision aligns with previous judgments by the ECHR, which have consistently upheld the importance of privacy and freedom of expression in the face of expanding surveillance capabilities. Notably, the court has previously ruled against mass surveillance practices, emphasizing the need for strict oversight and safeguards to prevent abuse and ensure that government actions remain within the bounds of legality and necessity.

The ECHR’s stance reflects growing concern over the potential misuse of surveillance technology and the importance of maintaining a healthy balance between national security interests and fundamental human rights. By ruling against the creation of backdoors, the court has sent a clear message about the value of privacy and security in the digital age, reaffirming the rights of individuals to communicate securely and without fear of undue government interference.

The implications of this decision are far-reaching, potentially influencing future legal and policy debates on surveillance and privacy not only in Europe but around the world. It reinforces the principle that security measures must not come at the expense of core human rights, urging governments to seek solutions that respect privacy while addressing security concerns in a proportionate and transparent manner.

Exit mobile version